Energy Smart Power Planner Beware
Question:
Beware of Energy Smart’s Power Planner by Coast Energy Management www.energysmart.com The claims are not arrived at in a valid way. The power measurements must ALLWAYS be taken BEFORE the Power Planner and not AFTER. Power factor must be used to calculate the actual power measured at the meter. The "demo" units commonly found in Home Depot have an "optimized" unit. A unit from the shelf will not yeild the same savings. Expect a payback on a unit running 24 hours a day to be 18months to 5 years not 6 to 14 months! Rules of thumb for any real savings: Must have full rated voltage as stated on the data plate. Must have stable power factor or the Power Planner will disengage. Must be running at less than 60% of the rated load of the motor. CAN work on more than one motor at a time but they must be under the same load. Watch out for the ground lug/bolts on the boxes. The powder coat does NOT conduct! Mounting the compensating capacitors to the ground lug/bolt isn’t a great idea to begin with and if the lug isn’t really grounded could make for a shocking experience! Using the ground as a current return is probably against most electrical codes as well. This guy is slick! If he pauses and squints a little, it’s time to leave. Bottom line: they work but not like they say they do at EnergySmart.
Response:
What actualy does that unit do and can it harm apliances
Response:
What actualy does that unit do and can it harm apliances
The devices monitor the amount of load on a motor and change the amount of applied voltage to optimize the performance. Induction motors suffer from poor power factor when operated at less than their fully designed load. When they operate at low power factors, their overall efficiency drops. A larger percentage of the input energy is wasted than when the motor operates under design conditions. If a fully loaded motor is operated at reduced voltage, it can be damaged by excessive currents and overheating. But a lightly-loaded motor can be operated at reduced voltage, and it’s poor power factor will actually improve. This device (and others like it) sense when the motor is fully loaded or lightly loaded and adjust the applied voltage automatically to optimize motor efficiency. The savings depend on how much time the motor is running with less than full load, and how poorly the motor efficiency drops under those conditions. Many home appliances do *not* operate under light load for very long. Refrigerator & A/C compressors are usually sized to be ‘just right’ and not oversized. When cooling is not needed, they shut off, not operate the motor ‘unloaded’. Blower motors on furnaces *may* be lightly-loaded depending on the exact adjustments of speed/flow. Machine shop tools and compressors that run ‘unloaded’/'loaded’ instead of shutting off/restarting are typical situations where some savings can be found using this type of controller. But most home users just shut their power saw when not using it
It isn’t really new, the idea/technology has been around for years. But you only realize some *real* savings in very special applications, not your average home refrigerator. daestrom
Response:
Daestrom is correct but I’ll add my 2 cents to the thread…. The Power Planners work by leaving an SCR turned off until the programmed processor tells it to turn on. This is done with a pot on the PCB. The idea is that an induction motor doesn’t need all of the energy it consumes when it’s not running at its full rated load. There are a great number of engineering articles on this subject, some go one way and some go the other way about energy used in induction motors at various loads. IF you have full voltage available and IF you have a non-high efficiency motor and IF it’s not running at near the full rated load and IF the Power Planner is adjusted correctly then you have good savings and reduced motor temps. With these conditions the Power Planner would maintain the voltage but just limit the amount of AC cycle exposed to the motor. The motor doesn’t go into an under-voltage/over-current condition and the work and RPMs are maintained and the whole setup uses less energy and the motor temp is reduced so your motor lasts longer. Everyone is happy! The Power Planners have 2 pots, one is for the engage delay and the other is for adjusting the amount of cut in the SCRs. The Power Planner IIs have just one SCR on the high leg, there is one version that had 2 parallel SCRs with no load equalizing circuit. Power Planner IIIs use 3 SCRs. An additional caution on the Power Planner IIIs: The PCB uses one of the legs as a psuedo reference and picks a little voltage off another leg to run the circuit. In other words the PCB is at or near the line voltage! Back to the pots, if you have what you believe is a good candidate for a Power Planner then the you can try messing with the pots and potentially get more a savings than the factory setting. I’ve heard of results where breakers on generators that used to trip no longer trip with the Power Planner but I’ve also heard of cases where the wiring did not allow for sufficient line voltage or a stable power factor and the Power Planner just would not produce a savings or would fail outright. The Power Planner I and II and fluorescent all use the same PCB, the Power Planner Is and IIs use the same programmed chip. The fluorescent model uses a different chip altogether and I believe is adjusted with a photo meter to brightness with regular ballasts, not sure if they claim it works on electronic ballasts. The chance of harming a motor depends on the set up. Trying to use a soft start on a motor that suddenly has a much greater load than it did when it was set up would probably lock up the motor and fail the smoke test. Soft start on the Power Planner III is one of the jumpers on the PCB that changes the delay pot to the current limit pot so it technically isn’t a soft start just a blind current limited start. Loosing an SCR on a three phase unit can cause issues with motors although the Power Planner will shut down sometimes if there is a lost leg. Electronics integrated into motor appliances like the new refrigerators can have issues and unusual operation with a Power Planner. Coast Energy Managements attempts to wire houses with a single phase Power Planner II with a 100-250amp SCR was a very bad idea and causes line filters to hum and speed controlled motors to act up although I’m not aware of any equipment damage/failures from the adventure. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Beware of Energy Smart’s Power Planner by Coast Energy Management www.energysmart.com The claims are not arrived at in a valid way. The power measurements must ALLWAYS be taken BEFORE the Power Planner and not AFTER. Power factor must be used to calculate the actual power measured at the meter. The "demo" units commonly found in Home Depot have an "optimized" unit. A unit from the shelf will not yeild the same savings. Expect a payback on a unit running 24 hours a day to be 18months to 5 years not 6 to 14 months! Rules of thumb for any real savings: Must have full rated voltage as stated on the data plate. Must have stable power factor or the Power Planner will disengage. Must be running at less than 60% of the rated load of the motor. CAN work on more than one motor at a time but they must be under the same load. Watch out for the ground lug/bolts on the boxes. The powder coat does NOT conduct! Mounting the compensating capacitors to the ground lug/bolt isn’t a great idea to begin with and if the lug isn’t really grounded could make for a shocking experience! Using the ground as a current return is probably against most electrical codes as well. This guy is slick! If he pauses and squints a little, it’s time to leave. Bottom line: they work but not like they say they do at EnergySmart.
Response:
I have taken them apart and wired in a SSR to increase the current so I could run my 240v 1.5hp well pump. It drops the current from 8a to 6a and yes, I tweaked the pots. I bought them on holiday special for $29 each, take a look: http://www.j-com.net/PFC_bare.JPG http://www.j-com.net/PFC_closeup.JPG http://www.j-com.net/PFC_BOX.JPG
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Daestrom is correct but I’ll add my 2 cents to the thread…. The Power Planners work by leaving an SCR turned off until the programmed processor tells it to turn on. This is done with a pot on the PCB. The idea is that an induction motor doesn’t need all of the energy it consumes when it’s not running at its full rated load. There are a great number of engineering articles on this subject, some go one way and some go the other way about energy used in induction motors at various loads. IF you have full voltage available and IF you have a non-high efficiency motor and IF it’s not running at near the full rated load and IF the Power Planner is adjusted correctly then you have good savings and reduced motor temps. With these conditions the Power Planner would maintain the voltage but just limit the amount of AC cycle exposed to the motor. The motor doesn’t go into an under-voltage/over-current condition and the work and RPMs are maintained and the whole setup uses less energy and the motor temp is reduced so your motor lasts longer. Everyone is happy! The Power Planners have 2 pots, one is for the engage delay and the other is for adjusting the amount of cut in the SCRs. The Power Planner IIs have just one SCR on the high leg, there is one version that had 2 parallel SCRs with no load equalizing circuit. Power Planner IIIs use 3 SCRs. An additional caution on the Power Planner IIIs: The PCB uses one of the legs as a psuedo reference and picks a little voltage off another leg to run the circuit. In other words the PCB is at or near the line voltage! Back to the pots, if you have what you believe is a good candidate for a Power Planner then the you can try messing with the pots and potentially get more a savings than the factory setting. I’ve heard of results where breakers on generators that used to trip no longer trip with the Power Planner but I’ve also heard of cases where the wiring did not allow for sufficient line voltage or a stable power factor and the Power Planner just would not produce a savings or would fail outright. The Power Planner I and II and fluorescent all use the same PCB, the Power Planner Is and IIs use the same programmed chip. The fluorescent model uses a different chip altogether and I believe is adjusted with a photo meter to brightness with regular ballasts, not sure if they claim it works on electronic ballasts. The chance of harming a motor depends on the set up. Trying to use a soft start on a motor that suddenly has a much greater load than it did when it was set up would probably lock up the motor and fail the smoke test. Soft start on the Power Planner III is one of the jumpers on the PCB that changes the delay pot to the current limit pot so it technically isn’t a soft start just a blind current limited start. Loosing an SCR on a three phase unit can cause issues with motors although the Power Planner will shut down sometimes if there is a lost leg. Electronics integrated into motor appliances like the new refrigerators can have issues and unusual operation with a Power Planner. Coast Energy Managements attempts to wire houses with a single phase Power Planner II with a 100-250amp SCR was a very bad idea and causes line filters to hum and speed controlled motors to act up although I’m not aware of any equipment damage/failures from the adventure. Beware of Energy Smart’s Power Planner by Coast Energy Management www.energysmart.com The claims are not arrived at in a valid way. The power measurements must ALLWAYS be taken BEFORE the Power Planner and not AFTER. Power factor must be used to calculate the actual power measured at the meter. The "demo" units commonly found in Home Depot have an "optimized" unit. A unit from the shelf will not yeild the same savings. Expect a payback on a unit running 24 hours a day to be 18months to 5 years not 6 to 14 months! Rules of thumb for any real savings: Must have full rated voltage as stated on the data plate. Must have stable power factor or the Power Planner will disengage. Must be running at less than 60% of the rated load of the motor. CAN work on more than one motor at a time but they must be under the same load. Watch out for the ground lug/bolts on the boxes. The powder coat does NOT conduct! Mounting the compensating capacitors to the ground lug/bolt isn’t a great idea to begin with and if the lug isn’t really grounded could make for a shocking experience! Using the ground as a current return is probably against most electrical codes as well. This guy is slick! If he pauses and squints a little, it’s time to leave. Bottom line: they work but not like they say they do at EnergySmart.
—–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–== Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–
Response:
Those are some cool pics of the mod you did to use the Power Planner in that application. I’m afraid I was originally mistaken when I said the Power Planner I and Power Planner II use the same board/circuit. I reviewed my notes and drawings to find they are different but they do use the same chip I believe. The Power Planner III is altogether different. http://www.ezend.com/ppi.tif 85K http://www.ezend.com/ppii.tif 97K http://www.ezend.com/ppiii.tif 550K LZW compression so you may need to download or recover from the cache folder to view with a graphics viewer depending on the browser and OS and all that stuff. Happy Hacking, Don – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have taken them apart and wired in a SSR to increase the current so I could run my 240v 1.5hp well pump. It drops the current from 8a to 6a and yes, I tweaked the pots. I bought them on holiday special for $29 each, take a look: http://www.j-com.net/PFC_bare.JPG http://www.j-com.net/PFC_closeup.JPG http://www.j-com.net/PFC_BOX.JPG Daestrom is correct but I’ll add my 2 cents to the thread…. The Power Planners work by leaving an SCR turned off until the programmed processor tells it to turn on. This is done with a pot on the PCB. The idea is that an induction motor doesn’t need all of the energy it consumes when it’s not running at its full rated load. There are a great number of engineering articles on this subject, some go one way and some go the other way about energy used in induction motors at various loads. IF you have full voltage available and IF you have a non-high efficiency motor and IF it’s not running at near the full rated load and IF the Power Planner is adjusted correctly then you have good savings and reduced motor temps. With these conditions the Power Planner would maintain the voltage but just limit the amount of AC cycle exposed to the motor. The motor doesn’t go into an under-voltage/over-current condition and the work and RPMs are maintained and the whole setup uses less energy and the motor temp is reduced so your motor lasts longer. Everyone is happy! The Power Planners have 2 pots, one is for the engage delay and the other is for adjusting the amount of cut in the SCRs. The Power Planner IIs have just one SCR on the high leg, there is one version that had 2 parallel SCRs with no load equalizing circuit. Power Planner IIIs use 3 SCRs. An additional caution on the Power Planner IIIs: The PCB uses one of the legs as a psuedo reference and picks a little voltage off another leg to run the circuit. In other words the PCB is at or near the line voltage! Back to the pots, if you have what you believe is a good candidate for a Power Planner then the you can try messing with the pots and potentially get more a savings than the factory setting. I’ve heard of results where breakers on generators that used to trip no longer trip with the Power Planner but I’ve also heard of cases where the wiring did not allow for sufficient line voltage or a stable power factor and the Power Planner just would not produce a savings or would fail outright. The Power Planner I and II and fluorescent all use the same PCB, the Power Planner Is and IIs use the same programmed chip. The fluorescent model uses a different chip altogether and I believe is adjusted with a photo meter to brightness with regular ballasts, not sure if they claim it works on electronic ballasts. The chance of harming a motor depends on the set up. Trying to use a soft start on a motor that suddenly has a much greater load than it did when it was set up would probably lock up the motor and fail the smoke test. Soft start on the Power Planner III is one of the jumpers on the PCB that changes the delay pot to the current limit pot so it technically isn’t a soft start just a blind current limited start. Loosing an SCR on a three phase unit can cause issues with motors although the Power Planner will shut down sometimes if there is a lost leg. Electronics integrated into motor appliances like the new refrigerators can have issues and unusual operation with a Power Planner. Coast Energy Managements attempts to wire houses with a single phase Power Planner II with a 100-250amp SCR was a very bad idea and causes line filters to hum and speed controlled motors to act up although I’m not aware of any equipment damage/failures from the adventure. Beware of Energy Smart’s Power Planner by Coast Energy Management www.energysmart.com The claims are not arrived at in a valid way. The power measurements must ALLWAYS be taken BEFORE the Power Planner and not AFTER. Power factor must be used to calculate the actual power measured at the meter. The "demo" units commonly found in Home Depot have an "optimized" unit. A unit from the shelf will not yeild the same savings. Expect a payback on a unit running 24 hours a day to be 18months to 5 years not 6 to 14 months! Rules of thumb for any real savings: Must have full rated voltage as stated on the data plate. Must have stable power factor or the Power Planner will disengage. Must be running at less than 60% of the rated load of the motor. CAN work on more than one motor at a time but they must be under the same load. Watch out for the ground lug/bolts on the boxes. The powder coat does NOT conduct! Mounting the compensating capacitors to the ground lug/bolt isn’t a great idea to begin with and if the lug isn’t really grounded could make for a shocking experience! Using the ground as a current return is probably against most electrical codes as well. This guy is slick! If he pauses and squints a little, it’s time to leave. Bottom line: they work but not like they say they do at EnergySmart. —–= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =—– http://www.newsfeeds.com – The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–== Over 100,000 Newsgroups – 19 Different Servers! =—–
Categories: