Posts belonging to Category 'Electric Furnace Parts'

Opinions and advice on POD

Question:

I have both a Line 6 Flextone II XL (basically a POD with a power amp and 2 speakers), and  a Johnson J-Station. I like the sound of the Line 6 amp and it’s versatility, but the J-Station has some nice amp models as well, especially the acoustic guitar simulator. It sounds fairly realistic with the right pups, etc. Of course it’s not an acoustic, but works just fine when you need to play both acoustic and electric parts live without changing geetars. I don’t really play the J-station much anymore, but I’m hanging on to it in case the Flextone breaks. To make a short story long… Both the POD and the J-Station have some nice, usable sounds. (I’m still looking for that ballsy twin sound out of a modeler though…  :-) Calan

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have both a Line 6 Flextone II XL (basically a POD with a power amp and 2 speakers), and  a Johnson J-Station. I like the sound of the Line 6 amp and it’s versatility, but the J-Station has some nice amp models as well, especially the acoustic guitar simulator. It sounds fairly realistic with the right pups, etc. Of course it’s not an acoustic, but works just fine when you need to play both acoustic and electric parts live without changing geetars. I don’t really play the J-station much anymore, but I’m hanging on to it in case the Flextone breaks. To make a short story long… Both the POD and the J-Station have some nice, usable sounds. (I’m still looking for that ballsy twin sound out of a modeler though…  :-) Calan I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

I ordered a J-station the other day, bought it online new + blemished..good buy at $109 considering they generally go for close to that on e-bay, and mine still comes with a warranty. The POD was just too expensive for me right now. Thanks for the info.

Response:

I actually find the preamp pretty usable for my purpose.  I’m not giging or recording.  Just having fun and my main reason for choosing the GT-6 is that it offered me the best bang for the buck.   They could have sqeezed a decent drum machine in there though. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I owned a POD and replaced it with the Boss GT-6.  The POD had great amp models but was lacking in the effects department, in my opinion. Not to mention if you want the floorboard, you have to spend about $250 more.  The GT-6 has better effects and has the foot switches and expression pedal built in.   All true, but, imho, the preamp models in the gt-6 suck.  I have tried it in as many configurations as I can think of and have yet to find a situation where the gt-6′ preamps work at all.  Major drawback! However, the rest of the unit is so good that it may be worth the money even if not using the preamps! Love the 4 cable method. Bear in mind that this unit does not have a true bypass and can dull the natural sound of an amp somewhat. Good Luck, Shawn Bottom line is what do you want it to do?  If you want a good amp modeler, the POD is great.  If you want an all around effects processor, I’d recommend the GT-6. I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated. I have a Behringer V Amp 2 and I love it. All the same features as the older POD and only 139 bux. I love mine and highy recommend it. Queso

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated. Also check the Behringer V-Amp 2 and maybe Digitech RP100. I think Boss GT6 is at the same price as the POD, as well some Digitech GNX. For value for money I would go with V-Amp 2 (which I own btw).

Thank you all for the info and opinions. I’m gonna do a little more research before deciding, I’m also watching a few auctions to see what prices these things come in at.

Response:

I owned a POD and replaced it with the Boss GT-6.  The POD had great amp models but was lacking in the effects department, in my opinion. Not to mention if you want the floorboard, you have to spend about $250 more.  The GT-6 has better effects and has the foot switches and expression pedal built in.  

All true, but, imho, the preamp models in the gt-6 suck.  I have tried it in as many configurations as I can think of and have yet to find a situation where the gt-6′ preamps work at all.  Major drawback! However, the rest of the unit is so good that it may be worth the money even if not using the preamps! Love the 4 cable method. Bear in mind that this unit does not have a true bypass and can dull the natural sound of an amp somewhat. Good Luck, Shawn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Bottom line is what do you want it to do?  If you want a good amp modeler, the POD is great.  If you want an all around effects processor, I’d recommend the GT-6. I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated. I have a Behringer V Amp 2 and I love it. All the same features as the older POD and only 139 bux. I love mine and highy recommend it. Queso

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

The Line 6 modelling stuff is fun to play around with and even useful provided you aren’t a demanding purist who breaks out in hives if he isn’t hearing tubes.  I have one major issue with them, when my L6 modelling amp broke down, while under warranty, I might as well have put a note in a bottle and chucked it into the sea as calling this company for help.  I left half a dozen phone messages with several of their managers and techs for a week and never got a call back, only when I got the amp manager of my local guitar shop to contact them did I finally get a call with an RA number so I could get the thing fixed.  And shortly after the warranty expired, the same problem returned anyway.  I would not buy another L6 product based on that experience.  However, I know highly experienced guitarists, pros, who love the POD and use it all the time, so I guess so long as it keeps working you’ll probably be happy with it.

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

I have a Behringer V Amp 2 and I love it. All the same features as the older POD and only 139 bux. I love mine and highy recommend it. Queso

Response:

I owned a POD and replaced it with the Boss GT-6.  The POD had great amp models but was lacking in the effects department, in my opinion. Not to mention if you want the floorboard, you have to spend about $250 more.  The GT-6 has better effects and has the foot switches and expression pedal built in.   Bottom line is what do you want it to do?  If you want a good amp modeler, the POD is great.  If you want an all around effects processor, I’d recommend the GT-6. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated. I have a Behringer V Amp 2 and I love it. All the same features as the older POD and only 139 bux. I love mine and highy recommend it. Queso

Response:

Same here I just play out with it. I use a AM Strat, Marshall JCM 2000 TSL twinstack and the POD. I get great clean sounds, and real great Van Halen type of distortion the closest I’ve ever heard.

How do you run the pod?  Do you run it through the fx loop of your amp or inline between the guitar and amp input? Thanks again, Shawn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I dont use the recording features I just play out live and it sounds great. What gear are you running the pod through when you play live?  What have been the responses? Thanks Shawn

Response:

Same here I just play out with it. I use a AM Strat, Marshall JCM 2000 TSL twinstack and the POD. I get great clean sounds, and real great Van Halen type of distortion the closest I’ve ever heard. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I dont use the recording features I just play out live and it sounds great. What gear are you running the pod through when you play live?  What have been the responses? Thanks Shawn

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Here’s a link to mt review of the POD I had some months ago. There are also some comments from other owners, and a few tips on use ect… http://www.angelfire.com/blues/rockinjohn/pod_review.html John King http://www.angelfire.com/blues/rockinjohn/rockinamps.html

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

I can’t comment on any of the other devices, but I have a POD 2, and I’ve always been very happy with it.   I can’t have a lot of volume where I am, and can’t afford to have any of the amps  it simulates; but it does an excellent job of reproducing them. I’ve had a lot of fun with it, and it is a very good recording aid (I know a number of local session players who’ve been using it heavily).   I’ve not had a chance to play live with it, so I can’t comment on dynamics. The only issue I have with it is that half of the patches and some of the adjustments are accessibly only via MIDI, from either a computer, an (extra) floorboard, or some other MIDI controller.   I expect that the others are similar.  I don’t know if the newer model POD has addressed this issue – they have changed the panel layout. -pk

Response:

I dont use the recording features I just play out live and it sounds great.

What gear are you running the pod through when you play live?  What have been the responses? Thanks Shawn

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated. The Behringer and Johnson are competing devices that are similar for a lot less money. I have the POD and its a matter of taste but a lot of people like the Behringer too. They differ a bit in a few features and the type of amps they model and the number of amps. The POD and others like it have always been an item you either like for what it is or you hate it. Many people who  hate it usually are tube purists etc who just dont think modeling stuff sounds quite right.  However for the convenience of practising anytime you feel it like with headphones on and the ease of recording your guitar into your PC etc etc you cant beat it.

Yeah, I’ve been looking at the Digitech and Behringer too. I was wondering are they the same as the POD interms of being able to use it as a preamp for directly recording to the pc???

Response:

Cheaper with similar features?  That would be the Johnson J-Station. Argueably not as good, but probably sufficiently good for your purposes, for less money. JC – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Check out the reviews at Harmony Central.. most of them are quite favorable. http://www.harmony-central.com/Effects/Data/Line_6/POD2-01.html — Jn. Most Precious Ink http://www.mostpreciousink.com share with me.. cause i need it right now, let me see your insides.. or write me off – cause I’d rather starve now if you won’t open up..

Response:

I’m 44 been playing since I was 6.  Just got rid of my Digitech RP-2000 and got the pod I like it, I like it enough that I went and bought the Floorboard for it which is a must if you intend to play allot with it, to change from clean to dirty quick.  But out of all the hundreds of effets I’ve tried I like it has nicer sounds then the Digitech products.  I dont use the recording features I just play out live and it sounds great. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Response:

I’m an old guy from the old school, so I’m not really up on the new stuff. I’m thinking about buying a Line 6 POD. I would like to hear opinions on it and also if there is a cheaper way to go for similar features. Do other brands have similar products for example?? Thank you. All advice will be appreciated.

Response:

Where to buy thermostats on Net?

Question:

… every hardware store, Lowes, Home Cheap-o , and Sears sells them with a warranty [and] has a person you can look at and talk to face to face

That could be a problem in itself. :) Dan O.

Response:

www.grainger.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

Response:

… every hardware store, Lowes, Home Cheap-o , and Sears sells them with a warranty [and] has a person you can look at and talk to face to face That could be a problem in itself. :) Dan O.

This is Turtle. If might be for some others but me. I’m the face to face kind of a Guy. TURTLE

Response:

www.grainger.com Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

this is Turtle. Awwwww One note see here. There is no warrenty on electric parts sold over the counter or what we call direct to customers. Thermostats are called electric parts. Now you will have to use a Service company name to order parts or open a account with them and have you listed as a company to get warrenty parts. Just a thought here. TURTLE

Response:

Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=thermostat 412,000 entries.

Response:

I just shopped – I wanted an elecrtonic one from Honeywell.  The Honeywell web site tells you which to use for what type of system.  When I decided on a model, the local barns and dealers all had the same price as internet dealers – so I bought local.  If you want to be pleased with it, buy a Honeywell, IMHO. Paul

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

Response:

Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

This is Turtle. I would be leary on buying thermostat over the internet when every hardware store, Lowes, Home Cheap-o , and Sears sells them with a warrenty that has a person you can look at and talk to face to face , if you need a new one under warrenty. TURTLE

Response:

Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

Response:

Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats?

www.ebay.com Do a search on thermostats. I found 783 of them. Some used, most new. Manual, digital, you name it……

Response:

The thermostats that are at the Borg are inferior to the ones that the pros use. I prefer the high end Honeywell

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone know a good place on the net where I could order home furnace thermostats? Thanks

Response:

The thermostats that are at the Borg are inferior to the ones that the pros use. I prefer the high end Honeywell

What makes them different?  Are you talking better components or more features? Ed

Response:

Electric kettle

Question:

I just zipped it – try downloading this: http://www.strangebrew.ca/Drew/cherms/heat.zip — Drew Avis ~ http://www.strangebrew.ca

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Doggy, I was wrestling with the right element combination to use for my 40 L electric brewery.  I build a spreadsheet that predicts the time to boil for various starting points, based on Ken Schwartz’s formulae.  You can check out the spreadsheet (it’s in Excel format) at: http://www.strangebrew.ca/Drew/cherms/heat.xls Humm… I can’t get the file to open… Have it in anyother format? Thanks

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Not even close… Also, I would suggest starting with a 5 gallon batch and working your way up to 25 after you have perfected a smaller batch formulation. Well, I said I was going to start with 10 gallon batches. I am trying to be nice here but WTF? If I wanted to do 5 gallon batches I would have built a 5 gallon system. Guess what I am not going to bash anyone who brews 5 gallon batches. However, for myself I would rather brew 25 gallons over 10 hours (a time way over stated) then 5 gallons (over 6 hours each) at a time over 24 hours with 5 times as much clean up… I come as a friend to talk beer lets start over. I hope you feel the same…

I think most everyone here does!  Perhaps the group doesn’t quite understand the sequence of events that you foresee with your brewing equipment. Howzabout a brief rundown on how you see things working.  It certainly seems like you have a novel approach.  I’d be interested in hearing some more. Bill

Response:

For example, look inside the guts of a hot tub.  The heater is contained within a metal container, that is redundantly grounded.  Once via the interior wiring and to the power supply, and separately via an external bonding lug that should be connected to a ground rod installed adjacent to the tub, along with the motor.  

This is DEAD wrong not only is a ground rod not required it is extremely dangerous. Yes, you need a redundant ground but it must be connected to the existing electrical grounding system. NEVER EVER EVER EVER a NEW MADE SYSTEM. With the set up you describe if the primary ground is lost and the GFI fails (and they do all the time) there will be no way to clear a fault. This would turn the grounding system and your ground rod into a giant heating element. To clear a fault the current must have a grounding path that leads back to the panel from where it is derived. If the path is to a rod it will be more than happy to simply discharge the current into the ground. I have seen this first hand in failed underground cables that "leak" current to ground without ever tripping the overcurrent protection device. I wont go into the GFI issue as it can do no harm to have one. But AGAIN GFI breakers over 20 amp 120 volt are designed to protect equipment not people. I don’t have the info with me now but could post it later if you like. I am also BTW a Master Electrician licensed in 3 states. So I know what I am talking about.

Response:

Doggy, I was wrestling with the right element combination to use for my 40 L electric brewery.  I build a spreadsheet that predicts the time to boil for various starting points, based on Ken Schwartz’s formulae.  You can check out the spreadsheet (it’s in Excel format) at: http://www.strangebrew.ca/Drew/cherms/heat.xls It’s not totally user friendly, but the first column is the total W for 240A elements, the second is the total W for 120A elements.  The Efficiency rating is how efficient your system is.  I used calculations based on an efficiency of 1.5 (50% heat loss) but have since crunched numbers based on other brewers’ experiences and believe that 1.2 is a better number for a well-insulated system. Try changing the Gals to 25 to see what kind of numbers you come up with for your system. Cheers! — Drew Avis ~ http://www.strangebrew.ca When this girl at the art museum asked me whom I liked better, Monet or Manet, I said, "I like mayonnaise." She just stared at me, so I said it again, louder. Then she left. I guess she went to try to find some mayonnaise for me.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess" Thanks!

Response:

Great information thanks!!! This just what I have been looking for! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Doggy, I was wrestling with the right element combination to use for my 40 L electric brewery.  I build a spreadsheet that predicts the time to boil for various starting points, based on Ken Schwartz’s formulae.  You can check out the spreadsheet (it’s in Excel format) at: http://www.strangebrew.ca/Drew/cherms/heat.xls It’s not totally user friendly, but the first column is the total W for 240A elements, the second is the total W for 120A elements.  The Efficiency rating is how efficient your system is.  I used calculations based on an efficiency of 1.5 (50% heat loss) but have since crunched numbers based on other brewers’ experiences and believe that 1.2 is a better number for a well-insulated system. Try changing the Gals to 25 to see what kind of numbers you come up with for your system. Cheers! — Drew Avis ~ http://www.strangebrew.ca When this girl at the art museum asked me whom I liked better, Monet or Manet, I said, "I like mayonnaise." She just stared at me, so I said it again, louder. Then she left. I guess she went to try to find some mayonnaise for me. I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess" Thanks!

Response:

Doggy, I was wrestling with the right element combination to use for my 40 L electric brewery.  I build a spreadsheet that predicts the time to boil for various starting points, based on Ken Schwartz’s formulae.  You can check out the spreadsheet (it’s in Excel format) at: http://www.strangebrew.ca/Drew/cherms/heat.xls

Humm… I can’t get the file to open… Have it in anyother format? Thanks

Response:

Sounds like I will be okay then. I am an electrician so I don’t fear electricity at all. If I get a shock I just turn the thing off!

Yes, an old electrician’s joke.  But at 8-15 mA, though painful, you can still let go.  Above 15 mA, adjacent muscles clamp, and you can’t let go.  At 50-100 mA ventricular fibrulation occurs. Seriously the type of GFI used over a 20 amp 120 volt circuit is not intended to protect from shock, but to protect equipment.

Sorry, you’re wrong about this.  Class A GFCI devices found in 15/20 amp circuits are required to trip at 4-5 mA, an order of magnitude below the 50 mA threshold for fatal shock.  I think you may be confusing this with the reason for a ground wire, which is sized to ensure that enough fault current is available to trip the overcurrent protection.  It’s an impedance thing. Double insulated devices are assumed to fail in other ways than by ground fault, and so do not require ground wires.  But you can still get a fatal shock from one that is not protected by a GFCI, due to capacitive coupling, or simply using your deck grinder in the rain. Heck, I once had to install ground wires on dozens of soldering irons.  I thought it was foolish, because anyone dumb enough to grab the business end of a plugged-in soldering iron deserves to get shocked. But of course there was more to it than that.  Touching said business end to a metal table could make you R(1) to ground. Grounding everything is important and keeping your electric parts dry is even more so. Having an easy quick way to shut off all the power to your system is very important.

All very basic common sense stuff, but it’s difficult to keep an immersion heater dry…If you’ve seen how a heater element fails, you’d know what I mean.  A GFI on a 30 amp 250 volt feed is just a waste of money.

You are partly correct in this.  The NEC does not require GFCI protection on a permanently installed electric water heater, provided the bonding rules are followed.  However, it seems like you’re talking about something else entirely here–an open kettle that is not permanently installed (regardless how it started life).  I don’t think you could characterize a GFCI as a waste of money in this case. In addition to the guidelines you mentioned above, there is one more to consider.  An exposed element in an open kettle does not have a current collector, the way a RIMS chamber that was properly bonded to ground would.  For example, look inside the guts of a hot tub.  The heater is contained within a metal container, that is redundantly grounded.  Once via the interior wiring and to the power supply, and separately via an external bonding lug that should be connected to a ground rod installed adjacent to the tub, along with the motor.  The current collector ensures that fault current flows from the failed heater element, directly to ground, tripping the overcurrent protection.  Many jurisdictions require additional GFCI protection, which in my experience does not work well in this application. If I were in your shoes, would I use GFCI?  Hmmm…I’d have to say that if there was no bonded current collector for the heater, and the kettle was open (gonna stick my hands in there to stir, maybe even with a metal spoon), I probably would use it.  I might even use one in any case.  It sure as hell can’t hurt, because there’s no inductive load to give me false trips. Regards, Mike Sharp

Response:

The element I have is also "folded" over itself. Not sure what "low density" means? Is there also a "high density"?

Low density means that the number of watts per unit area ( square inch) is low so that unit area does not have to get as hot as a high density element of the same wattage.  This reduces the opportunity for scorching.  High densities are usually not folded over on themselves. Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I use a 5500W low density ( the kind that is folded over itself) element in my extract brewery with no problem.  I even did a quadruple strength wort ( about 1.160 SG.) with it. — Dan Listermann Thanks Dan The element I have runs at about 26 amps at 240 volts.

Response:

Low density means that the number of watts per unit area ( square inch) is low so that unit area does not have to get as hot as a high density element of the same wattage.  This reduces the opportunity for scorching.  High densities are usually not folded over on themselves. Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com

Okay the one I have is folded over. Any idea just how hot these elements can get in boiling water (or wort). I also have a 1500 watt 240 volt element in line in my recirculating mash tun to maintain temperature. I was told to buy a 240 volt element and run 120 volts to it so it would not run as hot. I ran water throughout the system a few days ago and the element raised the temperature 40 degrees in 4 hours in 25 gallons of water. I was surprised it could do that! All I need it to do is maintain the temperature. I got an aqustat that will work with line voltage so I can set the mash tun temp.

Response:

says… I don’t have an answer, but another question. How are you planning on heating your mash water and hot liquor? If using electric, it sure sounds like your in for a painfully long brew day. How long does it take for you to boil 25 gallons of 70 f water? Also as I am using electric I can set a timer to heat my hot liquor tank. So it is done before I even start!

That’s true. Are you planning to use the same hlt to heat your mash and strike water? If so, and assuming you’re planning on 25 gallon batches, you’ll need to heat more than 25 gallons of strike + sparge water.

Response:

That’s true. Are you planning to use the same hlt to heat your mash and strike water? If so, and assuming you’re planning on 25 gallon batches, you’ll need to heat more than 25 gallons of strike + sparge water.

I was thinking of using a 40 gallon hot water tank (in fact I might be getting a new one for free Monday). Also I could add more water to my hot liquor tank while grain is in mash tun (an hour). I have never all grain brewed before so I am thinking of starting with a 10 gallon batch to start. Heck I don’t even have a place to ferment 25 gallons yet! I just got a real good deal on two 27 gallon kettles, I was going to use kegs before I found the kettles. But if I can brew 25 gallons I will do it, the more beer the better!

Response:

says… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Low density means that the number of watts per unit area ( square inch) is low so that unit area does not have to get as hot as a high density element of the same wattage.  This reduces the opportunity for scorching.  High densities are usually not folded over on themselves. Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com Okay the one I have is folded over. Any idea just how hot these elements can get in boiling water (or wort). I also have a 1500 watt 240 volt element in line in my recirculating mash tun to maintain temperature. I was told to buy a 240 volt element and run 120 volts to it so it would not run as hot. I ran water throughout the system a few days ago and the element raised the temperature 40 degrees in 4 hours in 25 gallons of water. I was surprised it could do that! All I need it to do is maintain the temperature.

You’re not planning on doing step mashes, or mashout? Personally, I don’t see much point in building a RIMS if you’re doing a single temp mash with no mashout.

Response:

You’re not planning on doing step mashes, or mashout? Personally, I don’t see much point in building a RIMS if you’re doing a single temp mash with no mashout.

When did I say I was only doing a single temp mash?

Response:

says… You’re not planning on doing step mashes, or mashout? Personally, I don’t see much point in building a RIMS if you’re doing a single temp mash with no mashout. When did I say I was only doing a single temp mash?

You said "All I need it to do is maintain the temperature". So, if you are doing a step mash, and it takes 4 hours to boost 40F, then you’re looking at a long mash schedule if you include a protein rest and mashout. Then you’re talking about 4 hours of boost time alone, not to mention rest times. With rests, boiling, lautering and chilling, and cleanup, I think you’re looking at least a 10 hour day! Also, I would suggest starting with a 5 gallon batch and working your way up to 25 after you have perfected a smaller batch formulation.

Response:

You said "All I need it to do is maintain the temperature". So, if you are doing a step mash, and it takes 4 hours to boost 40F, then you’re looking at a long mash schedule if you include a protein rest and mashout. Then you’re talking about 4 hours of boost time alone, not to mention rest times.

Yes, maintain temp is all I need from my re circulation mash tun. You took my words out of context. I can add heated water from my hot liquor tank to boot the temperature. With rests, boiling, lautering and chilling, and cleanup, I think you’re looking at least a 10 hour day!

Not even close… Also, I would suggest starting with a 5 gallon batch and working your way up to 25 after you have perfected a smaller batch formulation.

Well, I said I was going to start with 10 gallon batches. I am trying to be nice here but WTF? If I wanted to do 5 gallon batches I would have built a 5 gallon system. Guess what I am not going to bash anyone who brews 5 gallon batches. However, for myself I would rather brew 25 gallons over 10 hours (a time way over stated) then 5 gallons (over 6 hours each) at a time over 24 hours with 5 times as much clean up… I come as a friend to talk beer lets start over. I hope you feel the same…

Response:

Did you say 25 gal? Thats a big system. I use a 5500 watt 220 vac element in my 10 gal HLT and it will take 10 gal to boiling in about 15-20 minutes. Can’t say more without guessing. — Bill Alvin, TX Homebrewing site http://home.swbell.net/bufkin

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess" Thanks!

Response:

Okay the one I have is folded over. Any idea just how hot these elements can get in boiling water (or wort).

Not much above boiling. I also have a 1500 watt 240 volt element in line in my recirculating mash tun to maintain temperature. I was told to buy a 240 volt element and run 120 volts to it so it would not run as hot.

At that voltage it will put out a quarter of its rated voltage wattage – 375 watts.  About the same as a largish light bulb. — Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Low density means that the number of watts per unit area ( square inch) is low so that unit area does not have to get as hot as a high density element of the same wattage.  This reduces the opportunity for scorching.  High densities are usually not folded over on themselves. Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com I ran water throughout the system a few days ago and the element raised the temperature 40 degrees in 4 hours in 25 gallons of water. I was surprised it could do that! All I need it to do is maintain the temperature. I got an aqustat that will work with line voltage so I can set the mash tun temp.

Response:

I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess" Thanks!

Response:

says… I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess"

I don’t have an answer, but another question. How are you planning on heating your mash water and hot liquor? If using electric, it sure sounds like your in for a painfully long brew day.

Response:

I use a 5500W low density ( the kind that is folded over itself) element in my extract brewery with no problem.  I even did a quadruple strength wort ( about 1.160 SG.) with it. — Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? I ran a test with it with 25 gallons of water and it brought tap water (70 f) to a rolling boil in under 2 hours. So it will get the job done just don’t know if the element gets too hot in the kettle. Thinking it cant get any hotter than a 150,000 BTU gas burner? But maybe so? Anyone KNOW where I can find out for sure? Not really looking for someone’s "guess" Thanks!

Response:

I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort?

FWIW: I am building a brew setup using 4500 watt low density water heater elements myself. The research I did on the web of folks that are already doing this tells me that it should work well enough. The one recurring theme I kept reading though was to make sure you use GFI circuitry and everything is well grounded. Wet things and electricity are poor companions. My design calls for one 4500 watt element in my HLT, a reciculation chamber (RIMS) with another one inside a 1 1/2" copper pipe, and two 4500 watt elements in my brew pot. I won’t have all 4 elements turned on at once at any given time, but there is certainly reason to believe that 2 will be on at once. I point that out becuase as your current draw goes up you need to be more mindful of conductor (wire) sizes. —    http://www.newsfeed.com       The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–= Over 100,000 Newsgroups – Unlimited Fast Downloads – 19 Servers =—–

Response:

I don’t have an answer, but another question. How are you planning on heating your mash water and hot liquor? If using electric, it sure sounds like your in for a painfully long brew day.

How long does it take for you to boil 25 gallons of 70 f water? Also as I am using electric I can set a timer to heat my hot liquor tank. So it is done before I even start!

Response:

My design calls for one 4500 watt element in my HLT, a reciculation chamber (RIMS) with another one inside a 1 1/2" copper pipe, and two 4500 watt elements in my brew pot.

You might consider having two different sized elements in your brew pot. This gives you a bit more power flexibility.  I have a 5500 and a 3500 in mine.  I use both to bring it to almost a boil, the 3500 to boil and the 5500 for the rolling boil. — Dan Listermann Check out our E-tail site at www.listermann.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I am building an all grain set up. I would like to go all electric the big question I have is will a 5500 watt electric water heater element scorch my wort? FWIW: I am building a brew setup using 4500 watt low density water heater elements myself. The research I did on the web of folks that are already doing this tells me that it should work well enough. The one recurring theme I kept reading though was to make sure you use GFI circuitry and everything is well grounded. Wet things and electricity are poor companions. I won’t have all 4 elements turned on at once at any given time, but there is certainly reason to believe that 2 will be on at once. I point that out becuase as your current draw goes up you need to be more mindful of conductor (wire) sizes. —    http://www.newsfeed.com       The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! —–= Over 100,000 Newsgroups – Unlimited Fast Downloads – 19 Servers

=—–

Response:

I use a 5500W low density ( the kind that is folded over itself) element in my extract brewery with no problem.  I even did a quadruple strength wort ( about 1.160 SG.) with it. — Dan Listermann

Thanks Dan The element I have is also "folded" over itself. Not sure what "low density" means? Is there also a "high density"? The element I have runs at about 26 amps at 240 volts.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -FWIW: I am building a brew setup using 4500 watt low density water heater elements myself. The research I did on the web of folks that are already doing this tells me that it should work well enough. The one recurring theme I kept reading though was to make sure you use GFI circuitry and everything is well grounded. Wet things and electricity are poor companions. My design calls for one 4500 watt element in my HLT, a reciculation chamber (RIMS) with another one inside a 1 1/2" copper pipe, and two 4500 watt elements in my brew pot. I won’t have all 4 elements turned on at once at any given time, but there is certainly reason to believe that 2 will be on at once. I point that out becuase as your current draw goes up you need to be more mindful of conductor (wire) sizes. —

Sounds like I will be okay then. I am an electrician so I don’t fear electricity at all. If I get a shock I just turn the thing off! Seriously the type of GFI used over a 20 amp 120 volt circuit is not intended to protect from shock, but to protect equipment. Grounding everything is important and keeping your electric parts dry is even more so. Having an easy quick way to shut off all the power to your system is very important.  A GFI on a 30 amp 250 volt feed is just a waste of money.

Response:

Bumps in the road (long)

Question:

    A lot of this may be redundant for those of you who have been helping us out/following our progress,…. but its a sort of status report with more questions… Well,…         Our first attempts at using a single supplier for our system is not panning out so well. We called in the main components to a supplier we thought we were going to go with based on information found on the net, HomePower Magazine, as well as info and pricing on their site. After comparing our total system cost (not item by item) with the others we looked at they seemed to be the best and also seemed to have good things said (what we could find) about them. This was Friday am. We were told we would be called by the end of the day with a quote along with any suggestions on the setup we had laid out. Friday 4pm no word, gave a call and no info, we were told even though it was a holiday we would receive the information by fax Monday. Monday came an went, nothing (didnt mind what so ever due to holiday). Teusday 3pm, no word, gave another call and were asked (in response to our 1200watts of panels, inverter, 12 – L16-HC and all other associated items),.. "oh yeah, I got it right here, this is the grid tied system with no battery storage right? Um.. we made a few changes and are calling out 28 panels instead of the 8 BP150s that you setup…" I knew we were talking to an "order taker" as on Friday he told us he had only been there for a month or so and would get the information we gave him out to "one of his technicians". When I first called I explained we had a lot of shop loads which were pretty tough to quantify but based on info we had we were figuring 4kwh/day would probably more than suit our needs and we would be remote, no grid, and gave the location where the system would be installed. Somehow that got translated into a 28 panel (assuming 60watts each) grid tied system (perhaps because I called out an SW4024) with no battery storage (which I dont know what they thought we were going to do with 12 L16-HC’s on the quote). At this point I am really frustrated. He told us, "the technician said the system you laid out doesnt come anywhere near what your looking for". I asked for some clarification on this but he really didnt know what to tell me and was fumbling around a bit on the phone. I asked if he could have the "technician" call me to go over it. Again I was told he would call me right back. It is now 24 hours later,.. no word.         At this point I am back to feeling like I just have to be confident in my system, part it out, and figure it out from there. I dont want to sound like I have given up after one supplier but I havent really found a single source that is fairly competetive on the whole system. For most, a few items seem to push them way up on price. Either a very high per/watt panel price, little or no discount on Trace, etc.. At this point (4 weeks from the moving date) I know I have asked all of your opinion on this before but would appreciate any last bits of input you may have as I am feeling like that is the route we may be going.         We are thinking about changing the panels from the BP150’s to a smaller panel and getting more based on input that has brought up the points of shipping, and if one breaks we would loose 1/8th of our system. We are having a hard time not looking at the Photowatt 100’s/105’s that are available right now for 3.89 – 3.90/watt from solatron with shipping included. This would reduce the cost of the array’s by 400 to 600 dollars (basically pays for the mounts) not to mention the shipping. Additionally, we have found some widely varying prices on SW4024 inverters like 2563.00 on the low end and full list price from places like RealGoods(know about them) and anywhere inbetween from other places. As always the place that seems to have the low price on one item doesnt have the low one on half of the other things which is acceptable as we have only been comparing the prices for an entire system from a given supplier not component by component. This is to say that we have basically priced this system out about 6 times item by item and then compared the totals of each company. Then we compare the price if we go with multiple suppliers (losing some support I guess) and the price goes even lower. My head is spinning. I have no way to quantify the value of any of their "design service" as all have said "we have a handfull of example systems on our site/in our catalog, just pick the one closest to you and add or subtract panels and batteries as neccesary". This, while the example systems are handy for reference, doesnt seem like much design service to me. Here is the main components of the system we have laid out currently: -12 – Photowatt 105 panels (1260watts) – 2 or 3 pole mounts – cabling (we have yet to get an answer on the feasibility of making the inter-panel and inter-array wiring or wether its just cheaper to buy them) – C-60 or two C-35 charge controller (the 12 – 105’s is 52.5 amps and the 100’s would be 50 I am not sure if we would have to go to two controllers?) – Power panel kit (outback or backwoods solar) – SW4024 – more cabling – 12 L16-HC – more cabling – trimetric meter’s (one for house and one for garage) – 6KW diesel generator         As in the details, I am unsure how practical it is to make your own cabling (having to buy all the wire/connectors) as opposed to just purchasing them premade. I have made cables much like the ones outlined in this months Homepower Magazine many times. I realize the support / design issues that come along with using one supplier but it seems like coordinating all the components, and mainly price (hate to say it), into one supplier is proving difficult.         If anyone has any suggestion for suppliers that could "fill the whole bill" that are reasonable in price (this system seems to be coming in around 12-13K without the generator and shipping. Slightly less with the Photowatt panels). Additionally I havent heard/read anything drastic with regards to negative feedback on the photowatt panels but still looking. My calculations for the system were as follows: 1185ah battery bank giving 28.4 kwh total, with 14kwh at 50%DOD at 3-4kwh/day (load while working) that would allow approx 3-4 days. I am thinking we would be able to stretch that for substantially longer in bad weather/winter by only running the house and very few shop loads.     The low point of the system seems to be the winter where in we may only be getting little less than 200ah a day out of the panels for charging (based on 3.5hrs a day) which would have to be made up by the generator. Sorry for another long one,… Mark

Response:

Mark, Yikes. On a much smaller scale, I had a similar runaround from a local supplier when I first took over this place and needed, pronto, to do some safety upgrades. They publish a catalogue with no prices, so if you want a freaking bulb socket you have to ask for a quote. And then wait. And wait. Longer if you’re foolish enough to use email instead of forcing their direct attention with a phone call. Although I’m in Canada, and was doing my best to support local business, I ended up making my first purchases from Backwoods Solar in Indiana. I ran across them on the net doing a search for a specific part, asked a few simple questions, and the next thing I knew there was a hard-copy catalogue in my mailbox, while I was *still* waiting for a quote from the local supplier. On top of that, Backwoods answered several increasingly detailed questions, and even emailed me a document they had written for the convenience of their own customers, despite being warned up front that I was trying to spend my money at home. It was obvious who deserved the business, and I gave it to them. I only wish I had been buying more. It’s one thing when you know exactly what you want and you can shop on price. When you need an experienced dealer and some good advice, it’s well worth paying a bit extra IMHO — yet Backwoods’ prices were very competitive. Dunno quite what your next step is, but if you’re still shopping for a competent supplier, give them a try. (They can have the L-16’s drop-shipped from the closest distribution point, too. Saves on postage. <g) www.backwoodssolar.com -=s

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –     A lot of this may be redundant for those of you who have been helping us out/following our progress,…. but its a sort of status report with more questions…

Response:

While I’m certainly no expert on these things I think I can point out some obvious issues. The first being that dealers that sell a packaged system have to make their money somewhere. This is why you see all the variation and weirdness with prices. If you are really trying to shave pennies from the design you will probably wind up dealing with the lesser quality firms. If you feel you can do as good a job as these firms then you may truly be better off just parting it out and doing the work yourself. Here is the main components of the system we have laid out currently: -12 – Photowatt 105 panels (1260watts)

Actually, I’m told that, due to temperature, it’s a good idea to derate panels by about 20% from their STC ratings. This would make your 105 panels 84 watt panels. 12 of these would be 1008 watts in the real world. If you really need 1260 watts you may want to buy 14 (1176W) or 16 (1344W). – 12 L16-HC

L16H’s seem to be 6V 395Ah batteries storing some 2.3kWh each. This would mean that you would need three strings of 4 batteries each and your total drop dead battery pack storage would be some 28.4 kWh. I’ve been told that it’s better (when possible) to use a single string of batteries instead of parallel strings. I know price is the main driving point here but have you considered another style of battery and/or using 48 volts instead of 24? For instance, the Surrette 4KS-21P is a 4 volt 1100 Ah battery storing some 4.4 kWh each. 6 (six) of these in a single string would give you a 24 volt pack at 1100 Ah or 26.4 kWh and they might last a couple years longer than L16’s due to their design. If you went with 48 volts a Surrette 6CS-21PS is 6V 680 Ah and 8 of these would give you a 48 volt pack at 680 Ah storing 32.6 kWh. Even sticking with the L16’s you would be able to get 18.9 kWh in a single string by going with 48 volts. 16 PV panels could be wired as easily into 4 strings of 48V instead of 8 strings of 24V. Anthony

Response:

While I’m certainly no expert on these things I think I can point out some obvious issues. The first being that dealers that sell a packaged system have to make their money somewhere. This is why you see all the variation and weirdness with prices. If you are really trying to shave pennies from the design you will probably wind up dealing with the lesser quality firms. If you feel you can do as good a job as these firms then you may truly be better off just parting it out and doing the work yourself. Here is the main components of the system we have laid out currently: -12 – Photowatt 105 panels (1260watts)

Actually, I’m told that, due to temperature, it’s a good idea to derate panels by about 20% from their STC ratings. This would This is a big problem with most gas boilers they electric, so when the power goes off so does the boiler, a cut in system so that the heat continues would be a great asset on these boilers.

Response:

    A lot of this may be redundant for those of you who have been helping us out/following our progress,…. but its a sort of status report with more questions… Well,…         Our first attempts at using a single supplier for our system is not panning out so well.

I’d skip this supplier unless they come up with a reaaaally good price. If they can’t call you back promptly at this point in the game, they’re likely to be useless if you need any technical or warranty help after the sale. We got the same "we’re busy redesigning your system" stuff from the first supplier we called. Two weeks of waiting for a quote which turned out to be quite different from what we’d requested. Rather than diddle any longer, we gave them the heave-ho and never looked back. The next place I called http://www.sunelco.com/  was friendly, competant, and prompt, which is what you should expect given the amount of cash you’re forking over. We have some of the Photowatt 100 watt modules. Got them here http://www.sunelec.com/Specials_/specials_.html , shipped direct from the factory in NM    No complaints. Not sure if the newest ones are the same, but ours have a 1" frame. Kinda’ tight for installing the mounting bolts, but the 2" frames on our Solarex are only slightly better. Wattsun has tracking mounts that could hold your entire array http://www.wattsun.com/products/wattsun_trackers/AZ300.html Worth comparing the simpler installation, increased output, and less wear and tear on the batteries against smaller mounts and two additional modules IMO. One thing I appreciate about the place we purchased the bulk of our system – when I inquired about wire and cabling, they just said flat out that if I was interested in saving money, I could get all of that cheaper from local suppliers. YMMV. Wayne

Response:

Scott and Anthony,         Thanks for your input,.. Backwoods was one of our comparison systems that we looked at and we have spoken with them. The hard part is as Anthony said, that dealers have to make their money somewhere and its no surprise to me that the places offering the lowest prices arent going to do much work for you. While the company in question did have very competetive pricing (substantially lower than backwoods but not as low as some of the others we had seen) the total system we outlined would be about $2K more through backwoods. One thing we have learned from being in the construction business for so long is that that lowest bid is usually something to really be cautious of.         We are getting some material from Backwoods regardless (their power panel kit, etc) as in the two times we have spoken with them they have been nice and helpful over the phone which makes us want to give them some of our business.         As for the de-rating of the panels, I have heard this as well and even with the derated value I am not concerned in the summer as I think we will have ample power. In the winter the heat issue may not be so bad and we will be conserving so we will have to see. We simply cant budget much more for panels at this point as by adding panels we will also have to add mounts/controllers/etc. If the system doesnt meet our needs (which I think it is going to exceed) we will adjust.         The 48V issue is one we looked at breifly but not one we really considered. We pretty quickly jumped from 12v to 24v with some input from people in this group (thanks Bug) and are happy we did it. I think we will stick with the 24v but thanks for the input. We have looked at the Rolls line many times while researching batteries and they are a bit out of our price rance. We made the jump to the L16-HCs specifically for their projected life span. The extra 4 years (15 year life) for the rolls that we have read about was not enough for us to jump up on price.         One thing I have learned through all this is that this endeavor is much like my astronomy hobby. You look at say an 8" telescope and you say, well the 10" is only 400.00 more, so you get it, but then you have to upgrade the mount, there is another 1000.00, then you want bigger better cameras, accessories, and they are all conveniently priced a bit higher than the other. Before you realize it the 400.00 extra for the telescope became 5000.00 worth of adders. Hahah. I guess everything is that way we just have to know when to stop. Mark

Response:

I’d skip this supplier unless they come up with a reaaaally good price. If they can’t call you back promptly at this point in the game, they’re likely to be useless if you need any technical or warranty help after the sale. We got the same "we’re busy redesigning your system" stuff from the first supplier we called. Two weeks of waiting for a quote which turned out to be quite different from what we’d requested. Rather than diddle any longer, we gave them the heave-ho and never looked back. The next place I called http://www.sunelco.com/  was friendly, competant, and prompt, which is what you should expect given the amount of cash you’re forking over.

Wayne,..         They were the next on our list. I have spoken with Rosa there about a GL6500 Kubota generator that we are ordering from them. They have a very good price on that unit. Right after my wife and I read your post this am we reconfigured the array for the use of their Photowatt 95 panels that they have on their specials page for 3.70 a watt!!! We called Rosa and talked a bit with her about our situation and have faxed down the complete list and she is going to get us a 30 day quote on everything and said that picking and choosing from the quote was not a problem they were happy sell us what we wanted off the list.         One bonus is that we up’d the array to 14 photowatt 95’s (can add the other two if needed) which will give us an 8 panel array and a 6 panel array producing 1330 watts. We are thinking of making our own mounts as we have the metal shop so that shouldnt be a problem. We also went with two charge controllers (two C40DD’s) to accomodate the two additional panels if we need to add them. We are going to make our own wires as you said, I had thought that would be the way and your post sealed the deal.         We will let you all know how it pans out…. You have been a great help with the information you have provided,.. Thanks again… Mark & Shauna

Response:

Mark, You said: We have looked at the Rolls line many times while researching batteries and they are a bit out of our price rance. We made the jump to the L16-HCs specifically for their projected life span. The extra 4 years (15 year life) for the rolls that we have read about was not enough for us to jump up on price.

I looked at the Rolls too. Aside from the price, there’s the issue of weight. They are typically shipped dry, then you get to fill them with acid. Yoiks. Dry or not, they are HEAVY. I learned, when moving the old surplus stationary batts out of here — for which I had to build a winch/dolly gizmo — that there’s something to be said for a battery that can be lifted by a human being. :-) Of course you hope never to have to move them until you replace them, but sh*t happens. -=s

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Scott and Anthony,         Thanks for your input,.. Backwoods was one of our comparison systems that we looked at and we have spoken with them. The hard part is as Anthony said, that dealers have to make their money somewhere and its no surprise to me that the places offering the lowest prices arent going to do much work for you. While the company in question did have very competetive pricing (substantially lower than backwoods but not as low as some of the others we had seen) the total system we outlined would be about $2K more through backwoods. One thing we have learned from being in the construction business for so long is that that lowest bid is usually something to really be cautious of.         We are getting some material from Backwoods regardless (their power panel kit, etc) as in the two times we have spoken with them they have been nice and helpful over the phone which makes us want to give them some of our business.         As for the de-rating of the panels, I have heard this as well and even with the derated value I am not concerned in the summer as I think we will have ample power. In the winter the heat issue may not be so bad and we will be conserving so we will have to see. We simply cant budget much more for panels at this point as by adding panels we will also have to add mounts/controllers/etc. If the system doesnt meet our needs (which I think it is going to exceed) we will adjust.         The 48V issue is one we looked at breifly but not one we really considered. We pretty quickly jumped from 12v to 24v with some input from people in this group (thanks Bug) and are happy we did it. I think we will stick with the 24v but thanks for the input. We have looked at the Rolls line many times while researching batteries and they are a bit out of our price rance. We made the jump to the L16-HCs specifically for their projected life span. The extra 4 years (15 year life) for the rolls that we have read about was not enough for us to jump up on price.         One thing I have learned through all this is that this endeavor is much like my astronomy hobby. You look at say an 8" telescope and you say, well the 10" is only 400.00 more, so you get it, but then you have to upgrade the mount, there is another 1000.00, then you want bigger better cameras, accessories, and they are all conveniently priced a bit higher than the other. Before you realize it the 400.00 extra for the telescope became 5000.00 worth of adders. Hahah. I guess everything is that way we just have to know when to stop. Mark

Response:

Agreed,     For us we just had to do all the normal weighing of options, battery life vs. capacity vs. cost. We opted for the middle of the road in that we didnt want to go with batteries that were going to get us 5 years (concord) and we couldnt swing the rolls for the extra 5 years over the L16HCs/price ratio. If I were setting up a system where money was less of an issue the rolls or IBE would probably be serious contenders. But on our measily 15K system (if you can call that measily) we had to weigh it out. Filling the batteries is not really a problem for me as I am accustomed to having to fill batteries from motorcycles in a past fling with bikes. I am eager to hear where the nearest pickup point for me is for the L16HC’s in WV to see how far I will have to drive to get them.     Do you have a web page? What are the details of your system and where in Canada again? Mark

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Mark, You said: We have looked at the Rolls line many times while researching batteries and they are a bit out of our price rance. We made the jump to the L16-HCs specifically for their projected life span. The extra 4 years (15 year life) for the rolls that we have read about was not enough for us to jump up on price. I looked at the Rolls too. Aside from the price, there’s the issue of weight. They are typically shipped dry, then you get to fill them with acid. Yoiks. Dry or not, they are HEAVY. I learned, when moving the old surplus

Response:

good price on that unit. Right after my wife and I read your post this am we reconfigured the array for the use of their Photowatt 95 panels that they have on their specials page for 3.70 a watt!!! We called Rosa and talked a

I have 12 of the Photowatt PW-1000-95’s.  Had them about a year now. Seem like fine panels for the $.  I have room for about 8 more.  But I either need to win the lottery or the prices need to come down a bit more first.  :( A hint on the batteries…  Look in the local yellow pages, or the yellow pages for the furthest city to which you are willing to drive. Most cities over 100,000 or so have at least one battery wholesaler. You can usually get the batts for a lot less, and save a bundle on shipping, if you can pick them up locally and haul them yourself. Sometimes the local dealer will even deliver for less than $shipping. One other (semi-sad) note.  A local outfit recently sold a bunch of the L16 (not sure if they were the HC) which had "only been driven to church on sunday", err rather, "been kept fully charged on float since late 1999." He offered the last 40 to me at $100/each, but I couldn’t afford the money nor the space.  But ohh, it was tempting!!! sdb — IWant: Song of the South video — any digital format  *** An armed citizenry is our safety. More guns means less crime:  ISBN:0-226-49363-6  *** Watch out for munged e-mail address. User should be  sdbUse1  and host is  at  bigfoot.com Do NOT send me unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE)!

Response:

Although I’m in Canada, and was doing my best to support local business, I ended up making my first purchases from Backwoods Solar in Indiana. I ran

Hey, credit where credit is due! www.backwoodssolar.com

Those good folks are in my state, Idaho (ID) not Indiana (IN)!  :) (Folks are always confusing Idaho with Indiana or Iowa or …  Well Idaho is in the Pacific Northwest US, and the northern tip of Idaho touches Canada.) sdb — IWant: Song of the South video — any digital format  *** An armed citizenry is our safety. More guns means less crime:  ISBN:0-226-49363-6  *** Watch out for munged e-mail address. User should be  sdbUse1  and host is  at  bigfoot.com Do NOT send me unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE)!

Response:

Although I’m in Canada, and was doing my best to support local business, I ended up making my first purchases from Backwoods Solar in Indiana. I ran Hey, credit where credit is due! www.backwoodssolar.com Those good folks are in my state, Idaho (ID) not Indiana (IN)!  :)

Sorry, dumb Canuck. I only had the two-letter designation to go by, which I should have simply included rather than making a bad guess. -=s – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – (Folks are always confusing Idaho with Indiana or Iowa or …  Well Idaho is in the Pacific Northwest US, and the northern tip of Idaho touches Canada.) sdb — IWant: Song of the South video — any digital format  *** An armed citizenry is our safety. More guns means less crime:  ISBN:0-226-49363-6  *** Watch out for munged e-mail address. User should be  sdbUse1  and host is  at  bigfoot.com Do NOT send me unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE)!

Response:

Wayne and all,     Progress report… we faxed the list to Sun Electronics, 8 hours later the fax started chunking away and out came the quote with all the details and freight costs. They had a GREAT price on SW4024 and the generator. The panels were slightly more than the 3.70 a watt advertised on their site (3.84). Looks like between then and Backwoods Solar for the power panel, and some other peripherals we are back in business. Thanks for everyones help and input,.. Mark – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –     A lot of this may be redundant for those of you who have been helping us out/following our progress,…. but its a sort of status report with more questions… Well,…         Our first attempts at using a single supplier for our system is not panning out so well. I’d skip this supplier unless they come up with a reaaaally good price. If they can’t call you back promptly at this point in the game, they’re likely to be useless if you need any technical or warranty help after the sale. We got the same "we’re busy redesigning your system" stuff from the first supplier we called. Two weeks of waiting for a quote which turned out to be quite different from what we’d requested. Rather than diddle any longer, we gave them the heave-ho and never looked back. The next place I called http://www.sunelco.com/  was friendly, competant, and prompt, which is what you should expect given the amount of cash you’re forking over. We have some of the Photowatt 100 watt modules. Got them here http://www.sunelec.com/Specials_/specials_.html , shipped direct from the factory in NM    No complaints. Not sure if the newest ones are the same, but ours have a 1" frame. Kinda’ tight for installing the mounting bolts, but the 2" frames on our Solarex are only slightly better. Wattsun has tracking mounts that could hold your entire array http://www.wattsun.com/products/wattsun_trackers/AZ300.html Worth comparing the simpler installation, increased output, and less wear and tear on the batteries against smaller mounts and two additional modules IMO. One thing I appreciate about the place we purchased the bulk of our system – when I inquired about wire and cabling, they just said flat out that if I was interested in saving money, I could get all of that cheaper from local suppliers. YMMV. Wayne

Response:

A hint on the batteries…  Look in the local yellow pages, or the yellow pages for the furthest city to which you are willing to drive. Most cities over 100,000 or so have at least one battery wholesaler. You can usually get the batts for a lot less, and save a bundle on shipping, if you can pick them up locally and haul them yourself. Sometimes the local dealer will even deliver for less than $shipping.

    Sylvan,             What a great tip. I looked on the US Battery site for a local dealer near our land in WV for the L16-HCs and the nearest was about 4 hour drive. So for the heck of it I looked near here in MA where we are currently. There is a US battery dealer 10 minutes from our house, called them, they stock the L16 but not the HC’s. They called and can get them next week for 154.00!!! That cuts our battery bank down from 2148.00 to 1850.00. We will just pick them up here and take them with us when we move. Lot of weight but the savings as well as not having to drive 4 hours from the land to get them is worth it. Thanks a lot…         Mark

Response:

Lead acid batts… week for 154.00!!! That cuts our battery bank down from 2148.00 to 1850.00. We will just pick them up here and take them with us when we move. Lot of weight but the savings as well as not having to drive 4 hours from the land to get them is worth it.

May I throw a very nice spanner in these works? I have made my own lead acid batteries, and its real easy to do. They cost a small fraction of even the cheapest purchase price. And best of all, you can do that trick with the phosphoric acid that greatly increases both capacity and battery life. Now I wouldnt even consider spending that kind of money on batts, I’d make them for about a fifth the cost. The one caveat is youve got to know how to handle sulphuric acid. If you did chemistry A level, no prob. If not, you can just read up on it. The other caveat is working with sulphuric acid _will_ wreck your clothes, so wear old junk. BTW I would suggest making large 2v cells. Its the minimum effort max reliability way. It really is easy to do too. Regards, NT

Response:

NT,     I am always game for things such as this. However, planning, and putting together the entire system has been, and is going to be a pretty large task for us given that we will be moving to a piece of property without a single structure on it and living in a camper while we build a home and shop. All tools and equipment will not be easily accessible for the coming months while we get a barn up and we will need power. I think adding in learning and completing the construction of the batteries would be a bit much for us at this point. In a similar note I am really eager to give biodiesel a go but I will be buying #2 fuel oil for the first year til I can get my feet on the ground.     While the savings sounds great, its simply a sacrifice we will have to make at this point to get us our first ten years of battery bank. I would be very interested in doing any research or reading you may suggest about making batteries and will surely try it at some point…. Thanks for the input… Mark

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lead acid batts… week for 154.00!!! That cuts our battery bank down from 2148.00 to 1850.00. We will just pick them up here and take them with us when we move. Lot of weight but the savings as well as not having to drive 4 hours from the land to get them is worth it. May I throw a very nice spanner in these works? I have made my own lead acid batteries, and its real easy to do. They cost a small fraction of even the cheapest purchase price. And best of all, you can do that trick with the phosphoric acid that greatly increases both capacity and battery life. Now I wouldnt even consider spending that kind of money on batts, I’d make them for about a fifth the cost. The one caveat is youve got to know how to handle sulphuric acid. If you did chemistry A level, no prob. If not, you can just read up on it. The other caveat is working with sulphuric acid _will_ wreck your clothes, so wear old junk. BTW I would suggest making large 2v cells. Its the minimum effort max reliability way. It really is easy to do too. Regards, NT

Response:

Sounds interesting.  Any links to plans for DIY lead-acid batteries? — Bert Menkveld

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lead acid batts… week for 154.00!!! That cuts our battery bank down from 2148.00 to 1850.00. We will just pick them up here and take them with us when we move. Lot of weight but the savings as well as not having to drive 4 hours from the land to get them is worth it. May I throw a very nice spanner in these works? I have made my own lead acid batteries, and its real easy to do. They cost a small fraction of even the cheapest purchase price. And best of all, you can do that trick with the phosphoric acid that greatly increases both capacity and battery life. Now I wouldnt even consider spending that kind of money on batts, I’d make them for about a fifth the cost. The one caveat is youve got to know how to handle sulphuric acid. If you did chemistry A level, no prob. If not, you can just read up on it. The other caveat is working with sulphuric acid _will_ wreck your clothes, so wear old junk. BTW I would suggest making large 2v cells. Its the minimum effort max reliability way. It really is easy to do too. Regards, NT

Response:

Sounds interesting.  Any links to plans for DIY lead-acid batteries?

No, I made them before the internet showed up. It is remarkably easy though. There are several books around from 100 or so years ago that tell you how to do it. Back then, if you wanted leccy, you made your own genset and batts. You have an acid proof case, and thick lead plates. The books tell you to use lead compounds in the plates, but I never did. Just plain lead. If you use plain lead, you will need to readjust the acid strength after the first charge. If you are short on money you can collect old dead car batteries, melt down the lead, and pour it into moulds onto cleaned sand (for more surface area). And reuse the old batt cases too. I forget the exact acid strength… but its not hard to find. Do check out that thing with phosphoric acid… I forget the pat no, but it does extend battery life. Regards, NT – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – May I throw a very nice spanner in these works? I have made my own lead acid batteries, and its real easy to do. They cost a small fraction of even the cheapest purchase price. And best of all, you can do that trick with the phosphoric acid that greatly increases both capacity and battery life.

Response:

And all this would be a fine way to get your back yard declared a Superfund site. :( Seriously, messing around with old batteries could really be dangerous. You could get acute lead poisoning from inhalation of the fumes when you are melting the lead. Also, the sludge found in the bottom of the old batteries is full of lead salts and oxides, and presents a nasty disposal problem. I’m all for do-it-yourself stuff, but some things are best left to the pros. Gordon Richmond

Response:

I would like to second Gordon’s caution. It would be unwise to save a few bucks by ruining your long term health, and perhaps that of the neighborhood kids as well. While you can undoubtedly build a battery, you will find your home built performs poorly compared to the purchased items. You will use considerably more lead per amp hour, and you will have to take a lot of careful steps to make sure that the battery life is years rather than months. You may want to consider other battery types. The old Edison cell, Iron and nickel in potassium hydroxide, may be less polluting. Relatively low energy density, and I may have heard that they have a pretty high self discharge, but they wear like iron, so to speak. Good for a stationary few days storage.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – And all this would be a fine way to get your back yard declared a Superfund site. :( Seriously, messing around with old batteries could really be dangerous. You could get acute lead poisoning from inhalation of the fumes when you are melting the lead. Also, the sludge found in the bottom of the old batteries is full of lead salts and oxides, and presents a nasty disposal problem. I’m all for do-it-yourself stuff, but some things are best left to the pros. Gordon Richmond

Response:

Well,…         Our first attempts at using a single supplier for our system is not panning out so well.

Hi Mark, Here is what I did for my  roof mounted grid tied panels. I bought the parts wherever they were cheapest. I contacted a local solar installer, told him exactly what I had, and asked for an instalation price. I wanted to use a guy who was 1) known to the local electric company, 2) a registered elcetrician, 3)knew the permit process He then installed to code, providing wire, conduit, and othe small electric parts. I found on a 600 watt system, I could save  ~$1200 on the panel and the GC1000. It’s not too hard to do. It is just as much a headache for a small installer to order and collect parts as it is for anyone else. Do that part of the job for them, and they can better estimate their own costs, and avoid empty promises as to install date  we are all at the whim of our supliers) –georges

Response:

I would like to second Gordon’s caution.

Throwing caution to the wind, Mark’s Handbook for electrical engineers has a design for DIY lead acid batteries. One of the virtues of DIY is you can disasmble the battery and inspect the plates. Also, should freezing occur, you can salvage what you need. I’ve not done it yet, but it is on the list –georges

Response:

I missed the post. How did you make your own batteries? Thanks sandfella1 – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lead acid batts… week for 154.00!!! That cuts our battery bank down from 2148.00 to 1850.00. We will just pick them up here and take them with us when we move. Lot of weight but the savings as well as not having to drive 4 hours from the land to get them is worth it. May I throw a very nice spanner in these works? I have made my own lead acid batteries, and its real easy to do. They cost a small fraction of even the cheapest purchase price. And best of all, you can do that trick with the phosphoric acid that greatly increases both capacity and battery life. Now I wouldnt even consider spending that kind of money on batts, I’d make them for about a fifth the cost. The one caveat is youve got to know how to handle sulphuric acid. If you did chemistry A level, no prob. If not, you can just read up on it. The other caveat is working with sulphuric acid _will_ wreck your clothes, so wear old junk. BTW I would suggest making large 2v cells. Its the minimum effort max reliability way. It really is easy to do too. Regards, NT

Response:

I missed the post. How did you make your own batteries?

OK I’ll go over it… The basic esentials for each cell are a totally clean acid proof case, lead, sulphuric acid and distilled or deionised water. The ones I made were thin plate cells, so I simply used lead sheet, washing it and rinsing off with distilled water. I fitted the lead sheet in the case with a gap bwtween the sheets, secured them (you cant use anything metal other than lead). Now the case is filled with sulphuric acid of the correct specific gravity. I cant remeber the figure offhand, but its easy to find. Now the cell is charged. The first charge will form the lead compounds on the plates, so dont expect it to function propely till the 2nd charge. After the 2st charge you may nede to adjust the acid strength. Now you hvae one basic battery cell. Talk about simple! Some complications: Homepower systems should always use thick plate cells, not thin. ie thick solid lumps of lead, not sheet lead. Thin plate cells dont survive deep cycling. Learn to handle acid first!! and be _careful_. Have water and bicarbonate on hand in case you get it on you hands, in your eyes etc. Wear safety goggles and rag clothes. Any contact with acid, wash freely immediately. Allow a space between bottom of plates and bottom of case. Lead sludge collects down there and would short the battery out otherwise. Fit a top to the case: if much slowly drops into it it will soon die. The top must have a vent. Wash everything with deionised water before assmebling the cell. Fix the plates securely somehow – thats for you to figure out. Only acid proof things can be used. No metal at all. Use a strong case too. Battery lead sludge is poison. Do not dispose of it thoughtlessly. Finally, theres a neat trick from an old patent. Adding a very low concentration of phosphoric acid greatly icreases the capacity and life of the cells. The concentration is fairly critical, you have to get it just right for it to work. Suggested sources: battery cases: old car batt cases. Lead: from car batts, lead sheet, old lead window weights, melted down and poured into a mould. Acid: A battery manufacturer, maybe a chemist, or from old car batts if youre prepared to test it first with a little tiny test cell. Deionised water: buy from pharmacy or garage or make your own. Phosphoric acid: that will not be so easy to get. Now I might have left something out, or made a mistake… if you work with acid and toxic lead compounds, and get injured, you should have taken proper f2f instruction first. Regards, NT

Response:

S: Ovation volume knob (electric guitar)

Question:

Contact me. I know someone who bought a lot of Ovation’s electric parts stock. -drh —

Response:

Sorry, I just noticed as I was pushing the [send] button that you are in Germany. Try [ ] or call 860-379-7575 John

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I am looking for an Ovation volume knob for a 1975 Ovation Preacher guitar. A photo is on http://www.muc.de/~hm/images/ovation-knob.jpg Any offer will be heartily appreciated :-) No, the usual suspects like Allparts don’t have this knob. And while we’re at it, some of my other Ovations miss their original knobs too. If someone could point me to a source … :-) TIA — hm

begin 666 custserv_email.gif M1TE&.#EAUP`+`( “)QC(?__SB’Y! “““+ ““#7“L“`+_C(^IR^T/ M`XBTLFDCSKSG[86B`Y3E**&:"UOOR]&Q8=^5B1;;+P<,"#B7( ` end

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sorry, I just noticed as I was pushing the [send] button that you are in Germany. Try or call 860-379-7575 John Hi, I am looking for an Ovation volume knob for a 1975 Ovation Preacher guitar. A photo is on http://www.muc.de/~hm/images/ovation-knob.jpg Any offer will be heartily appreciated :-) No, the usual suspects like Allparts don’t have this knob. And while we’re at it, some of my other Ovations miss their original knobs too. If someone could point me to a source … :-) TIA — hm

Response:

Hi, I am looking for an Ovation volume knob for a 1975 Ovation Preacher guitar. A photo is on http://www.muc.de/~hm/images/ovation-knob.jpg Any offer will be heartily appreciated :-) No, the usual suspects like Allparts don’t have this knob. And while we’re at it, some of my other Ovations miss their original knobs too. If someone could point me to a source … :-) TIA — hm

Response:

I am looking for an Ovation volume knob for a 1975 Ovation Preacher guitar. A photo is on http://www.muc.de/~hm/images/ovation-knob.jpg Any offer will be heartily appreciated :-) No, the usual suspects like Allparts don’t have this knob.

It looks like something you could get from an electronics parts store, or steal from an old radio at a yard sale! Have you tried getting it from Kaman music directly? http://www.kamanmusic.com/ or http://www.ovationguitars.com/

Response:

Hi, I am looking for an Ovation volume knob for a 1975 Ovation Preacher guitar. A photo is on http://www.muc.de/~hm/images/ovation-knob.jpg Any offer will be heartily appreciated :-) No, the usual suspects like Allparts don’t have this knob. TIA — hm

Response:

Found a Turbo motor!; but…

Question:

After reading up on some websites, I think I can do this, but will need the BAP sensor and VAF meter off a T-bird.  Am I correct in this assumption? Thx again, Matt Walsh

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So ive been looking into the possibility of dropping a turbo engine into my 2.3L 87 LX.  I called just about all the boneyards in the yellow pages, and believe it or not, the last one I tried had one from an 88 TC ($450). They said it ran when pulled (6 yrs ago).  All they have in the warehouse is the motor, with all mechanical parts intact.  67K on the motor but it was looking pretty good.  Im going to rebuild it anyway.  Anyway, the yard says they scrapped the car years ago and only have the motor; no computers, or any electric parts or anything.  So, Is it possible to run this thing in my LX with or without all the computer controls.  No emissions checks here, so I was planning on taking all that junk off of there anyway (EGR, etc…). Thinking about it, The ignition system sounds to be the most difficult thing to tackle.     Something I just remembered: didn’t the TCs use some different type of turbo?  IHI?  I can just use this in the LX if this is do-able. Thx in advance, Matt Walsh Pics of the mighty LX when I get my scanner up and running.

Response:

So ive been looking into the possibility of dropping a turbo engine into my 2.3L 87 LX.  I called just about all the boneyards in the yellow pages, and believe it or not, the last one I tried had one from an 88 TC ($450).  They said it ran when pulled (6 yrs ago).  All they have in the warehouse is the motor, with all mechanical parts intact.  67K on the motor but it was looking pretty good.  Im going to rebuild it anyway.  Anyway, the yard says they scrapped the car years ago and only have the motor; no computers, or any electric parts or anything.  So, Is it possible to run this thing in my LX with or without all the computer controls.  No emissions checks here, so I was planning on taking all that junk off of there anyway (EGR, etc…). Thinking about it, The ignition system sounds to be the most difficult thing to tackle.     Something I just remembered: didn’t the TCs use some different type of turbo?  IHI?  I can just use this in the LX if this is do-able. Thx in advance, Matt Walsh Pics of the mighty LX when I get my scanner up and running.

Response:

Whats a good combo amp for this guitar?

Question:

i just got an Epiphone Sheraton [lefty!], and i was wondering what amp would be suited toward this guitar.  i need a combo, two 12’s, perhaps.  i cant spend a whole lot, maybe around $500, definately under $800.   thanks! <To All Those Who Fight In Isolation

Response:

i just got an Epiphone Sheraton [lefty!], and i was wondering what amp would be suited toward this guitar.  i need a combo, two 12’s, perhaps.  i cant spend a whole lot, maybe around $500, definately under $800.   thanks!

First of all, we don’t have a clue why you decided that you need two 12" speakers, and we also don’t have a clue what you intend to use this amp for. I suppose knowing what guitar you have might be useful info (I’d recommend replacing the pickups in Epi’s) but your being left handed is far less useful information than what kind of music you play is. Pete — Can I borrow a bucket of worms and a keg of gunpowder?  –Froggo

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – i just got an Epiphone Sheraton [lefty!], and i was wondering what amp would be suited toward this guitar.  i need a combo, two 12’s, perhaps.  i cant spend a whole lot, maybe around $500, definately under $800.   thanks! First of all, we don’t have a clue why you decided that you need two 12" speakers, and we also don’t have a clue what you intend to use this amp for. I suppose knowing what guitar you have might be useful info (I’d recommend replacing the pickups in Epi’s) but your being left handed is far less useful information than what kind of music you play is. Pete

Sorry about that!  I do a lot of stuff like Nick Cave or Death In June.  I do a lot of arpeggiated chords,  slow strumming, a lot of folk stuff.  Textural.  Im looking for a nice clean sound more than anything.  This would be for recording, not gigging.   I only mentioned 2  12"’s because Im interested in possibly an amp with an effects loop, so i can use stereo chorus or delay.  Sorry for the ambiguous first post.  i mentioned that i have a lefty  only because i was happy to have found one for a decent price a few moments before i posted, and it just carried into the post. What pickups would you recommend for this guitar, then? thanks.

Response:

The Fender Stage 160 would be good for what you are trying to do. I just saw a new one for $519. It sounded great and was LOUD! Jeff — Jeff Woertz E-Mail:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – i just got an Epiphone Sheraton [lefty!], and i was wondering what amp would be suited toward this guitar.  i need a combo, two 12’s, perhaps.  i cant spend a whole lot, maybe around $500, definately under $800. thanks! <To All Those Who Fight In Isolation

Response:

Sorry about that!  I do a lot of stuff like Nick Cave or Death In June.  I do a lot of arpeggiated chords,  slow strumming, a lot of folk stuff.  Textural.  Im looking for a nice clean sound more than anything.  This would be for recording, not gigging.   I only mentioned 2  12"’s because Im interested in possibly an amp with an effects loop, so i can use stereo chorus or delay.  Sorry for the ambiguous first post.  i mentioned that i have a lefty  only because i was happy to have found one for a decent price a few moments before i posted, and it just carried into the post.

SF Twin Reverb.  You won’t get an effects loop, but you’ll get a beautiful, sparkling clean sound. Brian — "Ay, who’s that little old man?" "It’s Paul’s grandfather."

Response:

First of all, we don’t have a clue why you decided that you need two 12" speakers,

Because he wants a BIG combo and we also don’t have a clue what you intend to use this amp for.

He WANTS to play GUITAR with it!!! your being left handed is far less useful information than what kind of music you play is.

Left handed music. hehe!! "Don’t be a weenie!"

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – i just got an Epiphone Sheraton [lefty!], and i was wondering what amp would be suited toward this guitar.  i need a combo, two 12’s, perhaps.  i cant spend a whole lot, maybe around $500, definately under $800.   thanks! First of all, we don’t have a clue why you decided that you need two 12" speakers, and we also don’t have a clue what you intend to use this amp for. I suppose knowing what guitar you have might be useful info (I’d recommend replacing the pickups in Epi’s) but your being left handed is far less useful information than what kind of music you play is. Pete Sorry about that!  I do a lot of stuff like Nick Cave or Death In June.  I do a lot of arpeggiated chords,  slow strumming, a lot of folk stuff.  Textural.  Im looking for a nice clean sound more than anything.  This would be for recording, not gigging.   I only mentioned 2  12"’s because Im interested in possibly an amp with an effects loop, so i can use stereo chorus or delay.

Brian Shaw’s advice about the Twin Reverb sound like a good one since you seem to be interested in clean sound.  They have more power than you need for recording, but they’re extra clean sounding.  Effects loops are really next door to useless.  The manufactures add those to amps mostly to help sell them with added features IMO.  You’d get more out of having a quality amp like a Silverface Twin Reverb, than you’d ever get out of an effects loop.   Sorry for the ambiguous first post.  i mentioned that i have a lefty  only because i was happy to have found one for a decent price a few moments before i posted, and it just carried into the post.

My nephew is left handed, he’s been playing guitar for a few years now, he gets better all the time.  And my niece (his little sister) is left handed too, and he just helped pick out a left handed Fender for her.  That should be great because those two get along really well, so she’s going to be able to learn all sorts of stuff from him.  I just found out that she was going to start learning guitar last night when I called up my brother to talk about Animaniacs and Histeria. What pickups would you recommend for this guitar, then? thanks.

Probably some of the lower powered Seymour Duncan pickups for clean sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with better parts, and besides the resonance in Epi’s is usually pretty darn good. Pete — Can I borrow a bucket of worms and a keg of gunpowder?  –Froggo

Response:

snip Sorry about that!  I do a lot of stuff like Nick Cave or Death In June.  I do a lot of arpeggiated chords,  slow strumming, a lot of folk stuff.  Textural.  Im looking for a nice clean sound more than anything.  This would be for recording, not gigging.  I only mentioned 2  12"’s because Im interested in possibly an amp with an effects loop, so i can use stereo chorus or delay.

2 X 12"s won’t necessarily make it stereo … dw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –  Sorry for the ambiguous first post.  i mentioned that i have a lefty  only because i was happy to have found one for a decent price a few moments before i posted, and it just carried into the post. What pickups would you recommend for this guitar, then? thanks.

Response:

What pickups would you recommend for this guitar, then?

I have an Epiphone Dot.  You definitely want to rid that guitar of those pickups.  Aside from the deplorable electronics, they’re very nice guitars though.  Originals of that model had the mini humbuckers, but I don’t think they still do. My recommendation for that guitar, as such, would be real Gibson humbuckers, like the "Classic 57" jobs (or whatever they’re called now). ~kp

Response:

Hey, what about the Cyclone? Doug

Response:

SF Twin Reverb.  You won’t get an effects loop, but you’ll get a beautiful, sparkling clean sound.

Twin. Bought a nice early SF for $500 out the door about two months ago. Given what you are looking for, can’t go wrong.

Response:

Hey Rocky!  The Sheraton only has 6 strings. Minumum required strings for a Cyclone is 7. Cheers! Steve – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hey, what about the Cyclone? Doug

Response:

 The Sheraton only has 6 strings. Minumum required strings for a Cyclone is 7. Cheers!

Damn it! Oh well, I guess Im lucky they’re all on back order. Doug

Response:

sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with

I’m amazed by the unanimous dissing of stock Epi pups and electric parts. If that’s the main flaw of the Epi’s, why doesn’t the factory spend the extra fifty bucks on doing it on a level with the expensive woods and craftsmanship involved? It just doesn’t make sense.Any other opinions? __ M    

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with I’m amazed by the unanimous dissing of stock Epi pups and electric parts. If that’s the main flaw of the Epi’s, why doesn’t the factory spend the extra fifty bucks on doing it on a level with the expensive woods and craftsmanship involved? It just doesn’t make sense.Any other opinions? __ M    

Yeah, they could do better.  They do offer good chunks of wood at very low prices, and the cheap Epi I just bought is 100 times better than my first guitar, but I’m still glad I didn’t pay any more for it than I did.   So far, new Schaller tuners ($27.00 in 1983) one PAF Pro pickup for $59, and a PAF from the late ’70s (figure the same cost), but the PAF is going to be replaced (it sucks) maybe with a Duncan ‘59 or something else that I already have.  And I need to shield the control cavity, so when I do that I plan to replace the pots and the switch. Hopefully I might have an unused SG switch, and I think I probably have the pots. But for some that type of thing would be almost impossible to do, and it’s the kind of thing I procrastinate with.  But figure the added price of what I’ve already replaced, and it would add over $100 to the cost, and there’s still more I need to do.  So figure WAY more than $100 added cost to walk out the door with one.  They probably couldn’t sell this guitar for that. Pete — Can I borrow a bucket of worms and a keg of gunpowder?  –Froggo

Response:

sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with I’m amazed by the unanimous dissing of stock Epi pups and electric parts. If that’s the main flaw of the Epi’s, why doesn’t the factory spend the extra fifty bucks on doing it on a level with the expensive woods and craftsmanship involved? It just doesn’t make sense.

Makes sense to the bean counters  ( or as they’re known around here, "Satan") …… $50 multiplied by …. how many units (guitars) ?? it’s plain ol’ greed. It ain’t their fault though …. it’s just an unavoidable facet of un-regulated free market capitalism. Hell! some beeeg companies have knowingly allowed people to die to save $20 a unit (motor vehicles). Any other opinions?

I think it’s probably Gilligans fault. dw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – __ M

Response:

sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with I’m amazed by the unanimous dissing of stock Epi pups and electric parts. If that’s the main flaw of the Epi’s, why doesn’t the factory spend the extra fifty bucks on doing it on a level with the expensive woods and craftsmanship involved? It just doesn’t make sense.Any other opinions?

Well I recently bought an Epi reissue of the Gibson Les Paul Signature ( a hollowbody style vaguely 335ish) with these low impedance humbuckers run thru a mullti-tap matching transformer. These pickups rule?? The xfrmr output tap switch gives me three distinct flavors plus a phase switch for the bridge pickup. While they may not perfectly match the originals the sound is exquisite. matt

Response:

I think the sound sucks. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – sounds.  The electronics in Epiphones are just so incredibly bad that it’s not funny, so don’t be surprised if the switch and the volume and tone control pots just self destruct without warning.  But don’t spend a lot of time worrying about it because it can all be replaced with I’m amazed by the unanimous dissing of stock Epi pups and electric parts. If that’s the main flaw of the Epi’s, why doesn’t the factory spend the extra fifty bucks on doing it on a level with the expensive woods and craftsmanship involved? It just doesn’t make sense.Any other opinions? Well I recently bought an Epi reissue of the Gibson Les Paul Signature ( a hollowbody style vaguely 335ish) with these low impedance humbuckers run thru a mullti-tap matching transformer. These pickups rule?? The xfrmr output tap switch gives me three distinct flavors plus a phase switch for the bridge pickup. While they may not perfectly match the originals the sound is exquisite. matt

Response:

Sorry about that!  I do a lot of stuff like Nick Cave or Death In June.  I do a lot of arpeggiated chords,  slow strumming, a lot of folk stuff.  Textural.  Im looking for a nice clean sound more than anything.  This would be for recording, not gigging.   I only mentioned 2  12"’s because Im interested in possibly an amp with an effects loop, so i can use stereo chorus or delay.  Sorry for the ambiguous first post.  i mentioned that i have a lefty  only because i was happy to have found one for a decent price a few moments before i posted, and it just carried into the post.

Others mention a Twin and that would be cool.  If you’re just using it for recording and not for giging you probably don’t need anything that big.  Maybe a Vibrolux or a Deluxe or a Princeton?  Also – you mention 2×12 in the context of wanting to use stereo effects.  I don’t have much experience with amps that have effects loops but I’m under the impression they don’t generally let you distribute stereo effects separately to the two speakers(?)  The only amp I can think of that does stereo effects is a Roland JC-120.  Anyone know if the smaller JCs do this as well?  That might be an interesting home recording amp. It’s SS but… -Scott McKnight

Response:

Reproducing it live?

Question:

On the other end are the jammy bands, Dave Matthews currently being the most popular with a big section of mainstream music fans..and they are jamming out the tunes with the hot musical performances, real singing and songs being the attraction..loose arrangements etc…sorta ‘old school’ approach, tho the music is unique and fresh.

I remember Liz Phair’s first show of her first tour; she was scared to death but didn’t want to mess with a band, so she trimmed it down even more than these other old schoolers- it was her, her guitar, and two Twins on a stage with a chandelier and a couch, rug, coffee table.  We all kinda laughed setting it up (the Aladdin Theatre in Portland OR USA), but that was the gig… Anyway- she pulled off the gig, the songs sounded great with no drums or bass, just her and the PA. -tom! — Happiness is one solid hunk of mahogany. http://www.fancy.org/music/time/ email if you have a Time guitar for sale! Tunes made with this fine device: http://www.mp3.com/ticktock

Response:

How do you guys who record/play out remedy that? Please see above. It’s about the experience of seeing a band live that over rides the missing parts. Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance.

I’ve listened to a couple that were pretty good.  Of course those tapes came off the sound board, not from the audience.  And they were multi-track originals that I listened to after the mix down. — I do not speak for any corporation, organization or government. All opinions expressed are strictly my own.

Response:

Long post alert. Read or skip. Comments, corrections always welcome.-Steve – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance. I’ve listened to a couple that were pretty good.  Of course those tapes came off the sound board, not from the audience.  And they were multi-track originals that I listened to after the mix down. You’re missing the point. The point is simply that "the show" can be a powerful thing and can make up for the fact that there are flaws in the performance when compared to the original recording. When I saw the Who live recently you didn’t hear me say… Wow, that electric gtr that Pete’s using with the acoustic gtr simulator pedal really sounds like crap compared to the recording of Pin Ball Wizard.  Oh and where’s his Hi-Watts and Les Paul? Well maybe I said the later… <g Mark Plancke SOUNDTECH RECORDING STUDIOS

Or maybe not even flaws. The original late 60s and 70s heavy rockers knew their live shows were gonna be different. Hendrix live with a strat, some Marshalls and some pedals was totally different from his frequently brilliant multi-track studio extravaganzas. Both good in their own way but way different. Only the songs’/ chords were the same. The way he went about ‘getting over’ live was totally different and -on a good night- a singularly powerful experience unlike anything else in his music, or rock in general..   Live Cream’s was much better for me than their studio stuff. With a couple of exceptions, it took the Who several years to get powerful studio recordings of that somewhat captured (a tamed down, but sonically close) version of their live stuff, circa ‘Who’s Next.’ Led Zeppelin were aces in the studio, but their best, fresh hot studio tracks (mainly Zep 1, 2 and 4) seemed mainly like them succeeding in capturing their live energy very well on disc. One of the reasons they rose to the very top of hard rock and stayed there for many years was Page’s ability as a producer to capture the energy and power of the drums and guitars in the studio -and you could take the resulting LP and home or to the car and crank it up and get a very good (for the first time in rock recording) approximation of the power of their live show. That music jumped off their records. As time went by the superstar generally guitar heavy looser (and different-frequently more exciting and better sounding than the studio release) bands gave way to a more planned out/staged shows with more strictly arranged songs. I remember going to see Santana several times at their early 70s era first peak and they played Note for Note renditions of their recordings. They had such a strong and fresh sound. As music changed and became sorta AOR commercial, you had bands like the Doobies (first era) coming out and doing the same thing. The long brilliant improvs and unique concert reworkings of the tunes (or general approach to concerts) shifted into ‘let’s do it more like the hit single.’ The music business was changing as FM and some AM radio was beginning to play the recordings (the first Zep album got initially huge-and their first concerts sold out literally by a ton of word of mouth, I kid you not). In the mid 70s the music biz was growing, radio was jumping on AOR rock, T40 played a few of the rockier band…and the seeds of what is now a normal rock concert were being sown. With few exceptions, today’s mainstream rock groups want to give a somewhat accurate presentation of the recording. Sure bands do this to varying degrees… The teen pop acts are on one end of the spectrum — out there ‘in concert’ with 80% of everything prerecorded (vocals too) and doing Identical shows everynight down to all dance moves and stage patter. The shows are punched up by flashy staging, dancers, lights, props/gimmicks, fireworks etc. On the other end are the jammy bands, Dave Matthews currently being the most popular with a big section of mainstream music fans..and they are jamming out the tunes with the hot musical performances, real singing and songs being the attraction..loose arrangements etc…sorta ‘old school’ approach, tho the music is unique and fresh. And there are tons of bands walking the middle ground, many wanting to deliver an honest rock show, in a someone like Creed’s case, writing/recording with generally a single big guitar part on the records, something they can reproduce without too much trouble (whether you happen to like what the guy’s actually playing or not).   Other bands use more overdubs on the records and use various things to fill things out live, from simple volume and playing a comp of the most important guitar parts that make up the song. I had mentioned U-2s long standing concert formula of having the Edge’s single guitar (admittedly sometimes with a lot of echo) front and center and loud..and Clean- being all they need to pull off most of their songs great live. They probably have some of this in mind when coming up with those key guitar parts, imo. Some bands bring an extra tour guitarist out to play the other parts. And some use technical means (samplers, prerecordings) to fill out the sounds so they can sound have a powerful full live sound representative of the recording. But many bands/artists live shows are just designed to ‘work live’-get them over in a big exciting way. The Who example is a perfect one. I saw them in the 70s during probably their peak and during the era when Townshend was using a wall of HiWatts to fill lots of space with great powerful chunky crunchy guitar. Moon and Entwhistle were playing ‘lead drums and bass’-Townshend was the freakin foundation/rock holding the songs together!:)…This was totally different from their powerful (in a more traditional and organized way) studio recordings of that era. And the Who were spectacular live then. No one thought about a missing acoustic, maybe some ragged or missing harmonies or anything, we were blown away by they the over-the-top way and ‘different’ way they presented their tunes that concert. We knew we were seeing one of the great rock bands playing full out giving everything they had. It was very special. I happened to go to their 25th anniversary reunion/tour in 1989 and it was totally different. Townshend almost refused to tour-admitting they finally offered him so much money he had to tour. But he played acoustic guitar almost all night due to his hearing- tho advances in PA and concert sound technology woulda allowed him to play electric at a low stage volume and crank it through the PA. Instead, they brought out a 10-12 piece band and BG singers (and a second guitarist to play Pete’s original classic electric parts)… and did a sorta "Las Vegas" Who thing. Sure all the songs were letter perfect…and -probably for the first time- all the keys and background vocals on the recordings were reproduced perfectly by the big tour band and singers. But it wasn’t the Who-4 (sometimes 5) rockers taking it to the max and blowing you away with the power of their performance, aided by the huge sound of their amps.   It was the ‘Who Revue.’ A large well rehearsed group that rendered note for note renditions of the classics. Maybe Daltry may have broken a bit of a sweat. No one else did, onstage or in the audience. As you mention, the Who’s recent tour saw Townshend rethink things and they are once again approach their show with a small powerful band…in which Townshend is again the only -powerful- electric guitarist. I wish I woulda known they had returned to form when the tix went on sale. It sold out quickly, I later read reports from the road saying they were doing in their classic power-style and friends who saw it here confirmed it. Great, punchy classic Who style power playing which worked superfine in concert. imo Steve Submitted via WebNewsReader of http://www.interbulletin.com

Response:

Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance. I’ve listened to a couple that were pretty good.  Of course those tapes came off the sound board, not from the audience.  And they were multi-track originals that I listened to after the mix down.

You’re missing the point. The point is simply that "the show" can be a powerful thing and can make up for the fact that there are flaws in the performance when compared to the original recording. When I saw the Who live recently you didn’t hear me say… Wow, that electric gtr that Pete’s using with the acoustic gtr simulator pedal really sounds like crap compared to the recording of Pin Ball Wizard.  Oh and where’s his Hi-Watts and Les Paul? Well maybe I said the later… <g Mark Plancke SOUNDTECH RECORDING STUDIOS Windsor, Ontario, Canada http://SoundTechRecording.com "And sure, there’s great opportunity for the use of digital cameras; there’s plenty of chocolate boxes that need pictures of dogs on it, just as there are plenty of awful jingles and fucking Coke commercials that can be made with digital recording. Analog recording is an art that cannot be replicated. It can only be mimicked. It pains me to see and hear things done sloppily for the sake of convenience." — Alex Newport

Response:

Obviously… but that doesn’t give the band the excuse to play a version of the song that doesn’t sound as good

I don’t know… Why don’t you ask the remaining member of Milli Vanilli what he thinks about that subject. Mark Plancke SOUNDTECH RECORDING STUDIOS Windsor, Ontario, Canada http://SoundTechRecording.com "Dozens of people spontaneously combust each year, it’s just not widely reported" – DAVID ST. HUBBINS

Response:

Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance. I’ve listened to a couple that were pretty good.  Of course those tapes came off the sound board, not from the audience.  And they were multi-track originals that I listened to after the mix down. You’re missing the point.

I got the point.  I’m just being contrary.   — I do not speak for any corporation, organization or government. All opinions expressed are strictly my own.

Response:

Please see above. It’s about the experience of seeing a band live that over rides the missing parts. Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance.

Obviously… but that doesn’t give the band the excuse to play a version of the song that doesn’t sound as good, you know, like "hey, everyone’s gonna be so excited to hear this song that they’re not gonna notice that there’s one guitar playing instead of 24."  So what you’re saying can be true to a degree, but not totally. -Dan

Response:

Please see above. It’s about the experience of seeing a band live that over rides the missing parts. Have you ever listened to a live concert that you attended on tape? It doesn’t come close to the experience that you felt being a part of the performance.

Yeah, when you remove the visual experience of seeing the group’s bigtime live show (often enhanced by a million dollar computerized lighting rig), take the sound level down a fraction of the volume it was played at during the concert over the killer concert PA -and play it in your living room or wherever…also the fact that you are not feeling the concert excitement of several thousand other screaming fans… yeah an audience tape of a hot show can sometimes be a bit of a let down. The huge guitar sound which worked great for the band when added in to all the other loud and flashy concert things may seem a bit lacking when reduced to living room volume..you tend to miss those guitar overdubs they may have stuck into the studio track to strengthen it so it Would sound good in your living room or on the radio. As someone else was getting at- the live show should work live. It’s not necessarily meant to stand up to a non-pro concert recording or even sound board recording…tho many artists shows do (I’ve heard some killer recent Jeff Beck and Steely San stuff…from audience recorders and soundboard tapes.) If the band puts out an official live release, they’ve usually done whatever to make sure it’s strong to stand on it’s own when played at home. An audience recording does a great disservice to the artist as there no way the fidelity you heard -much less the intensity you felt – can be captured by a little stereo recorder. Soundboard tapes better -if usually inaccurate- as you are getting the fully mic-ed mix the soundguy was sending to the house. You gotta realize they are what they are. Still I’ve heard some amazing audience tapes and soundboard stuff from some admittedly great artists/players/bands. I’ve gotten some cool live stuff from Napster -sometimes I think it’s the thing Napster’s best at…people make great live recordings available…some garbage but generally a heck of a lot of good liver stuff from today’s artists-not that big a deal as recording technology is so good these days and lots of bands-big and lesser known-put out all kinds of live stuff for promotional reasons, charity, PBS etc. But there’s also rare recordings of many of the all time greats during their peaks- Zeppelin, Van Halen, many great guitarists etc. captured by all manner of recording…and the magic comes through. But there is no excuse-especially with all today’s sampling/sequencing technology to ‘recreate the recording’ available if needed live- for a live performance not be strong and represent the band. I really enjoy the bands/artists who don’t use the technical tricks or have a huge backing band to punch up the live show. They may add a musician or loop in a critical part on a tune…but they know they are different-but still strong live. Heck U-2 is coming around soon, and I pulled out the Zoo TV or maybe Rattle and Hum videos and checked em out. Just the trio and Bono-a bunch of echo and volume and lights and stuff. One or two keyboard things dropped in. Great vids if you like that band. Great vids if you wanna see 4 guys grab onto and hold 50,000 people in the palm of their hand for a couple hours. I went to those actual shows and those guys nailed us to the wall. Then I hear one of the hits from Joshua Tree on the radio and notice there’s about 15 guitars, all kinds of tunings, electrics acoustics, echoes, e-bows, feedback…this symphony of guitar making this track an awesome atmospheric studio track (even if it’s only 3 or maybe 2 chords) – and I realize that it was totally strong, probably stronger live…with the simple main parts played so powerfully by the band..and the presence everything about the live performance added to the tune. Just way different from the studio recording, but as good or better, and totally U-2. imo Steve

Response:

You know, when I went to see Dream Theater for the first time, I knew they had 1 guitarist and was thinking to myself that whenever Petrucci starts to solo, it’s gonna sound really weak, and I wanted to see if it would sound bad.  By the end of the show I didn’t even notice, I forgot about the whole thing. That was me going in there trying to notice that problem.  Now if you take a regular person who doesn’t care about it, there’s even less of a chance that it’ll sound weak.  Whenever you’re soloing, and especially when everything else is at rock concert volumes, you don’t notice that a piece is missing. I mean, if you did that on a recording you’d notice, but when the bass is already rumbling through your body, it never sounds too weak.

Yeah that’s true, just like everything else, I’m sure musicians are the only ones to notice. -Dan

Response:

All I’ll add is that a CD doesn’t have the benefit of visual stimulation which can be a very powerful thing. You must do everything possible to communicate with your audience in the recorded form.

Wow, Mark can post to a thread that’s not been initiated by Jarl? Amazing.  ;) -tom! — Happiness is one solid hunk of mahogany. http://www.fancy.org/music/time/ email if you have a Time guitar for sale! Tunes made with this fine device: http://www.mp3.com/ticktock

Response:

Either one is acceptable, personally, it depends on whether I have to play the songs live for people who have listened to the CD. In this case I like to keep it close to live arrangement, maybe throw in an acoustic guitar track, or a 3rd ambient guitar and double the lead/bg vox, but never add anything that becomes a staple in the song. When I do a little project of my own, sky’s the limit. But what do you think? If you listen to early XTC albums when they played live, they kept it simple so they could (and did) reproduce it live. This was an issue for the Beatles, at 1st they pulled it off great live, then when they started doing stuff like Paperback Writer, they struggled live and eventually just made music in the studio with out worrying about reproducing it live. Stu – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? RZ (we play alternative rock BTW) Rob Ziruolo’s band…. SHADES OF GRAY http://www.geocities.com/soggymusic http://www.geocities.com/shadesofgrayband

Response:

You know, when I went to see Dream Theater for the first time, I knew they had 1 guitarist and was thinking to myself that whenever Petrucci starts to solo, it’s gonna sound really weak, and I wanted to see if it would sound bad.  By the end of the show I didn’t even notice, I forgot about the whole thing. That was me going in there trying to notice that problem.  Now if you take a regular person who doesn’t care about it, there’s even less of a chance that it’ll sound weak.  Whenever you’re soloing, and especially when everything else is at rock concert volumes, you don’t notice that a piece is missing. I mean, if you did that on a recording you’d notice, but when the bass is already rumbling through your body, it never sounds too weak. — Jarl = The music of the distant future. Tzar’s band = The music of the distant past. Ipacak = This is what’s happening NOW! Check out my band (Ipacak) at: http://www.ipacak.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – All I’ll add is that a CD doesn’t have the benefit of visual stimulation which can be a very powerful thing. You must do everything possible to communicate with your audience in the recorded form. A lot of you guys mentioned that it’s hard to pull of a complex arrangement live, but I’ll add one more thing from a listeners standpoint.  Whether it’s something to do live, or something not to do in the studio, you decide… I think it sounds bad if a song done in the studio is very layered, but live, it sounds thin because there are only 3, 4, etc people in the band..  For example, if a band with one guitarist records a lead and then puts chords under that, but live, obviously he’s playing the lead so all you hear underneath that is the bass. How do you guys who record/play out remedy that? -Dan

Response:

When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? I used to be a huge Queen fan, but one thing that always bugged me was that they sucked live.  Great performance, not so great music.  Brian May seemed to enjoy having fifty or more guitar tracks on all the songs, and trying all of that on stage with just one guitar didn’t really cut it.

Response:

When recording, you should make the best possible recording- if it takes 250 tracks, then thats what it takes. For playing live, use those great arranging skills that you used in the studio to come up with a creative arrangement live. I hate when bands play things ‘just like the record’- why not stay home and listen to the record then?? If people like your CD, they will love your live show- put a lot of effort into both. Dave Eichenberger- guitars.loops.devices http://www.hazardfactor.com When playing those same songs live, come up

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – For me it depends on the purpose of the CD.  When I record songs that are intended to be handed out to clubs and such, I want it to be close to what we sound like live so potential employers know what they’re getting.  No point in having an over-produced and arranged CD then not having them call you back because you didn’t sound like the disc. If you’re going for your opus then pull out all the stops and do whatever suits the music best! Either way have fun with it! george — http://marinich.home.att.net When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? RZ (we play alternative rock BTW) Rob Ziruolo’s band…. SHADES OF GRAY http://www.geocities.com/soggymusic http://www.geocities.com/shadesofgrayband

Response:

All I’ll add is that a CD doesn’t have the benefit of visual stimulation which can be a very powerful thing. You must do everything possible to communicate with your audience in the recorded form.

A lot of you guys mentioned that it’s hard to pull of a complex arrangement live, but I’ll add one more thing from a listeners standpoint.  Whether it’s something to do live, or something not to do in the studio, you decide… I think it sounds bad if a song done in the studio is very layered, but live, it sounds thin because there are only 3, 4, etc people in the band..  For example, if a band with one guitarist records a lead and then puts chords under that, but live, obviously he’s playing the lead so all you hear underneath that is the bass.   How do you guys who record/play out remedy that? -Dan

Response:

When I record, I do whatever it takes to convey the complete idea of the song, regardless of whether it can actually be reproduced live.

Yes. If I then choose to do it live (or at least attempt it), then I take whatever steps are necessary to adjust the song in order to do it successfully – if possible.

Yes. I think of the recording as the "permanant" version of the song and the one I must be absolutely satisified with. Afterall, music is fleeting as it is – I see no point in cutting corners and making compromises just to perform it live.

Yes. Of course performing is no less important, I’m just saying that the two should not be considered the same thing – since each possess their own unique ability to communicate the idea – which afterall is the most important thing as far as I’m concerned…

Yes. All I’ll add is that a CD doesn’t have the benefit of visual stimulation which can be a very powerful thing. You must do everything possible to communicate with your audience in the recorded form. Mark Plancke SOUNDTECH RECORDING STUDIOS Windsor, Ontario, Canada http://SoundTechRecording.com "Dozens of people spontaneously combust each year, it’s just not widely reported" – DAVID ST. HUBBINS

Response:

A very interesting question.  Just curious though, what kind of stuff are you thinking of doing that you can’t perform live?  If you’re doing harmonized leads, you could get a pedal to take care of it, or the much cooler option, get another guitarist to play the other part.  I almost pissed in my pants when I was watching Pink Floyd or some kind of tribute band (I’m not sure what Pink Floyd looks like, but this show had all their songs and was on CN8 up here around Philly, anyone see it??)  and the two guitarists started harmonizing the solo to Comfortably Numb.  Very cool indeed. If you’re talking about sound effects and stuff, I think you could get some kind of sampler or something and maybe just someone to control it.  I’m not familiar with these, so maybe someone else could help you. I’d say to go all out with your record.  Just like Axeman said, if you think it compliments the song, put it in.  Just don’t go too crazy.  And it’s fun to find ways to reproduce the sounds again live.  For our first album, most of the solos were written in my studio (we recorded in my basement so we have the freedom to do that), and then I had to learn the solos from my own recordings to reproduce later. — Jarl = The music of the distant future. Tzar’s band = The music of the distant past. Ipacak = This is what’s happening NOW! Check out my band (Ipacak) at: http://www.ipacak.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? RZ (we play alternative rock BTW) Rob Ziruolo’s band…. SHADES OF GRAY http://www.geocities.com/soggymusic http://www.geocities.com/shadesofgrayband

Response:

For me it depends on the purpose of the CD.  When I record songs that are intended to be handed out to clubs and such, I want it to be close to what we sound like live so potential employers know what they’re getting.  No point in having an over-produced and arranged CD then not having them call you back because you didn’t sound like the disc. If you’re going for your opus then pull out all the stops and do whatever suits the music best! Either way have fun with it! george — http://marinich.home.att.net

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? RZ (we play alternative rock BTW) Rob Ziruolo’s band…. SHADES OF GRAY http://www.geocities.com/soggymusic http://www.geocities.com/shadesofgrayband

Response:

When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live?

As far as I’m concerned there is a distinct difference between "writing" music and "performing" music. When I record, I do whatever it takes to convey the complete idea of the song, regardless of whether it can actually be reproduced live. If I then choose to do it live (or at least attempt it), then I take whatever steps are necessary to adjust the song in order to do it successfully – if possible. I think of the recording as the "permanant" version of the song and the one I must be absolutely satisified with. Afterall, music is fleeting as it is – I see no point in cutting corners and making compromises just to perform it live. If you can’t live up to the recorded version, then just don’t perform it. Of course performing is no less important, I’m just saying that the two should not be considered the same thing – since each possess their own unique ability to communicate the idea – which afterall is the most important thing as far as I’m concerned… Good Luck! — NRAFrog; The most well-armed frog there is, yet still in touch with the vulnerable  frogs… now let’s all sing together! "I’ve got a basketball jones…"    - Axeman      (happy "tomcarp"?)

Response:

When making a cd, should you: 1) create songs you can reproduce live, or 2) make the possible sounding cd, even if the layering of guitars means you cannot achieve the same sounds/solo/etc live? Opinions please? RZ (we play alternative rock BTW) Rob Ziruolo’s band…. SHADES OF GRAY http://www.geocities.com/soggymusic http://www.geocities.com/shadesofgrayband

Response:

Installing fluorescent outside light

Question:

        I’m replacing an incandescent with a fluorescent.         The old one was screwed into a conduit that projects from the corner of the garage.  When I unscrewed the old one, I couldn’t get the new one on, because the openings were the same size and threaded the same way.         Does there exist a "bridge" connector into which I can screw both sides to make a tight connection?         If not, how do I solve this? TIA — Polar (email copies welcome)

Response:

Better give us some more information. What size "conduit openings" are we talking about (approximately)  Is there an electrical box involved here?? What did you screw off and what exactly are you trying to screw on?? — regards,  RichG .

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m replacing an incandescent with a fluorescent. The old one was screwed into a conduit that projects from the corner of the garage.  When I unscrewed the old one, I couldn’t get the new one on, because the openings were the same size and threaded the same way. Does there exist a "bridge" connector into which I can screw both sides to make a tight connection? If not, how do I solve this? TIA — Polar (email copies welcome)

Response:

    I am a little confused.  The openings are the same size and were threaded the same way.  What is the problem?     I might suggest that in most areas fluorescent are not the best thing to use outside.  They have problems with cold weather.  Even those designed to handle it become a lot less efficient when cold. — Dia ’s Muire duit Joe M

Response:

Better give us some more information. What size "conduit openings" are we talking about (approximately)  Is there an electrical box involved here?? What did you screw off and what exactly are you trying to screw on??

1.  Openings are (per my best measurement!) approx. 6/8". 2.  No electrical box involved on the outside of garage.  What’s on the inside is blocked by huge computer boxes, but I would assume conduit carrying wires has to come off *something*.   3.  I unscrewed a cheapo two-light incandescent (photo-electric), no longer have the box.   This fixture is threaded on the *inside*, so I conjecture that the long-ago electrician had to install a threaded *something* onto the conduit coming out of the garage, so it would accept an inside-threaded fixture.  Or maybe the *something* was always there?  Sorry, I didn’t monitor his work at the time. I have tried & tried to remove the "something", but it won’t come off, and on second thoughts, maybe it *shouldn’t* come off, or I would have no way to screw the new fixture on. 4.  Am trying to screw on an 18-watt Regent  photo-electric fixture which is threaded on the *outside*.  I watched electrician install a fluorescent  fixture on my front porch.  He just seemed to screw the new one onto the projecting, threaded conduit in the wall.  So I don’t know whether he used an adapter, or?? I followed the directions to assemble the *new* light; connected the wires with wire nuts, turned on the juice, and it lit up fine. But when I went to attach it to the projecting, threaded conduit on the garage wall, the wire nuts wouldn’t fit through (OK, I can use tape, though I don’t like to), but the worst part is that there seem to be *two* projecting threaded elements. That’s why I asked whether there exists an adapter to bridge the two. In reply to other poster, I reminded front-porch electricion to use caulk, per directions, but he said that it wasn’t necessary in this (mild) climate. As he’s an experienced old-timer, I respected his judgment. BTW, this is not the "long-ago" electrician mentioned in #3. If I have to end up calling him again, and spending big bux to hook up what should be a simple job, I will kick myself! Thanks for your patience in talking me through this! — Polar

Response:

I guess I’m dense since I can’t figure out what it is you have and what it is you are trying to do. I THINK the following. 1. You have an electrical box inside of a wall or only accessible from the inside of the building. The open plate (inside) side of the electrical box is covered by "computer boxes" that you either can’t or don’t want to get to. 2. On the outside of the wall, you have two 1/2 inch conduit male ends protruding?? They would probably measure 3/4 inch on the outside. They have male threaded ends. They are probably short lengths of either iron pipe or actual conduit with male ends affixed. At least one of them held the former light fixture. If all you want to do is extend them and reverse the male/female threads, a simple 1/2 or 3/4 inch pipe coupling will do that. 3. The new device (fluorescent fixture) has a male 1/2 conduit fitting protruding out of it????? Is this correct?????  If all that you want to do is "reverse the threads" then a simple pipe coupling will do that. It appears that you have to get to the actual electrical box either from the outside ( apparently you have looked at it and can’t find that opening available) or from the inside…behind the "computer boxes".   Assuming the "computer boxes" are moveable????? and you can get at the electrical box cover plate from the inside……the electrical connection ( wire nuts) should be made inside of the electrical  box! Assuming you can get to the electrical box…you may well be able to unscrew the old conduit protrusions from inside of the electrical box. Move or discard the old conduit extensions. Then place the male protrusions from your new fixture into the same hole.(depending on the new fixture’s male protrusion length and the width of the wall)..and affix it with the proper conduit nut.  Then…… feed your new fixture’s wires back into the inside of the electrical box, and make your electrical connections inside as they would normally be. All of the above is simply based on my "guess" as to what we are really dealing with. — regards,  RichG .

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –     I am a little confused.  The openings are the same size and were threaded the same way.  What is the problem?     I might suggest that in most areas fluorescent are not the best thing to use outside.  They have problems with cold weather.  Even those designed to handle it become a lot less efficient when cold. — Dia ’s Muire duit Joe M

Response:

You need a junction box (type NEMA 3R for outdoor installation) in any case by code. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Better give us some more information. What size "conduit openings" are we talking about (approximately)  Is there an electrical box involved here?? What did you screw off and what exactly are you trying to screw on?? 1.  Openings are (per my best measurement!) approx. 6/8". 2.  No electrical box involved on the outside of garage.  What’s on the inside is blocked by huge computer boxes, but I would assume conduit carrying wires has to come off *something*. 3.  I unscrewed a cheapo two-light incandescent (photo-electric), no longer have the box.   This fixture is threaded on the *inside*, so I conjecture that the long-ago electrician had to install a threaded *something* onto the conduit coming out of the garage, so it would accept an inside-threaded fixture.  Or maybe the *something* was always there?  Sorry, I didn’t monitor his work at the time. I have tried & tried to remove the "something", but it won’t come off, and on second thoughts, maybe it *shouldn’t* come off, or I would have no way to screw the new fixture on. 4.  Am trying to screw on an 18-watt Regent  photo-electric fixture which is threaded on the *outside*.  I watched electrician install a fluorescent  fixture on my front porch.  He just seemed to screw the new one onto the projecting, threaded conduit in the wall.  So I don’t know whether he used an adapter, or?? I followed the directions to assemble the *new* light; connected the wires with wire nuts, turned on the juice, and it lit up fine. But when I went to attach it to the projecting, threaded conduit on the garage wall, the wire nuts wouldn’t fit through (OK, I can use tape, though I don’t like to), but the worst part is that there seem to be *two* projecting threaded elements. That’s why I asked whether there exists an adapter to bridge the two. In reply to other poster, I reminded front-porch electricion to use caulk, per directions, but he said that it wasn’t necessary in this (mild) climate. As he’s an experienced old-timer, I respected his judgment. BTW, this is not the "long-ago" electrician mentioned in #3. If I have to end up calling him again, and spending big bux to hook up what should be a simple job, I will kick myself! Thanks for your patience in talking me through this! — Polar

Response:

    I think I have an idea about what Polar is talking about.     I am guessing he has outdoor waterproof boxes and some outdoor flood light sockets for them. — Dia ’s Muire duit Joe M

Response:

I guess I’m dense since I can’t figure out what it is you have and what it is you are trying to do. I THINK the following. 1. You have an electrical box inside of a wall or only accessible from the inside of the building. The open plate (inside) side of the electrical box is covered by "computer boxes" that you either can’t or don’t want to get to. 2. On the outside of the wall, you have two

only ONE  1/2 inch conduit male ends protruding?? They would probably measure 3/4 inch on the outside. They have male threaded ends. They are probably short lengths of either iron pipe or actual conduit with male ends affixed. At least one of them held the former light fixture. If all you want to do is extend them and reverse the male/female threads, a simple 1/2 or 3/4 inch pipe coupling will do that.

Yes, I picked one up at the electric parts place; looks like it will do the trick. Thanks for your time and advice; sorry my explanation was not clear. 3. The new device (fluorescent fixture) has a male 1/2 conduit fitting protruding out of it????? Is this correct?????  If all that you want to do is "reverse the threads" then a simple pipe coupling will do that.

I shouldn’t have confused the issue with threads… [...] — Sara Meric

Response:

You need a junction box (type NEMA 3R for outdoor installation) in any case by code.

???? The former light was installed by an electrician working for the city. I guess it never got inspected, or…? I may be having some more city-sponsored work done this Spring, and will certainly draw their attention to this — if it is indeed a code violation. Everything in the garage runs off the house.  Dunno if that makes a difference. Thanks for the heads-up. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Better give us some more information. What size "conduit openings" are we talking about (approximately)  Is there an electrical box involved here?? What did you screw off and what exactly are you trying to screw on?? 1.  Openings are (per my best measurement!) approx. 6/8". 2.  No electrical box involved on the outside of garage.  What’s on the inside is blocked by huge computer boxes, but I would assume conduit carrying wires has to come off *something*. 3.  I unscrewed a cheapo two-light incandescent (photo-electric), no longer have the box.   This fixture is threaded on the *inside*, so I conjecture that the long-ago electrician had to install a threaded *something* onto the conduit coming out of the garage, so it would accept an inside-threaded fixture.  Or maybe the *something* was always there?  Sorry, I didn’t monitor his work at the time. I have tried & tried to remove the "something", but it won’t come off, and on second thoughts, maybe it *shouldn’t* come off, or I would have no way to screw the new fixture on. 4.  Am trying to screw on an 18-watt Regent  photo-electric fixture which is threaded on the *outside*.  I watched electrician install a fluorescent  fixture on my front porch.  He just seemed to screw the new one onto the projecting, threaded conduit in the wall.  So I don’t know whether he used an adapter, or?? I followed the directions to assemble the *new* light; connected the wires with wire nuts, turned on the juice, and it lit up fine. But when I went to attach it to the projecting, threaded conduit on the garage wall, the wire nuts wouldn’t fit through (OK, I can use tape, though I don’t like to), but the worst part is that there seem to be *two* projecting threaded elements. That’s why I asked whether there exists an adapter to bridge the two. In reply to other poster, I reminded front-porch electricion to use caulk, per directions, but he said that it wasn’t necessary in this (mild) climate. As he’s an experienced old-timer, I respected his judgment. BTW, this is not the "long-ago" electrician mentioned in #3. If I have to end up calling him again, and spending big bux to hook up what should be a simple job, I will kick myself! Thanks for your patience in talking me through this! — Polar

– Sara Meric

Response:

Travelling with your guitar

Question:

Hey guys, I’m in the process of learning with my Strat copy (hence my being in this group) and would love to take it with me on a planned airline trip to Canada in a few weeks. Do I really need to get a hardshell case or will a gigbag do? And if not, can I take the gigbag on the flight with me as carry-on luggage? Thanks for any insight. Scott Tampa, FL

Response:

I travel all of the time with mine. I would not recommend under any circumstance to travel with just a gig bag. I use a hardshell case( Fender) and I wrap duct tape (over plastic wrap) over the latches. I haven’t had a problem yet. Fingers are crossed each time however. The reason I  wouldn’t trust a gig bag for the overhead beside’s other bags being pushed into it, there is no guarantee they will let you put it in or that it will fit and you would foced to check it in.

Response:

Hello. Maybe this will help: What I did was to buy a decent second hand cheap electric, strip it from all the electric parts, make a wooden pickguard, and there is your (now acoustic) guitar that you can take apart in two peaces (body – neck) that will fit inside your suitcase. No worries about anything while flying. Just an idea. Bye, John – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I’m in the process of learning with my Strat copy (hence my being in this group) and would love to take it with me on a planned airline trip to Canada in a few weeks. Do I really need to get a hardshell case or will a gigbag do? And if not, can I take the gigbag on the flight with me as carry-on luggage? Thanks for any insight.

Response: